EUO no show is unconditional
October 27, 2016 1 Comment
Integrative Pain Medicine, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51525(U) “Appearance at an EUO is a condition precedent to coverage (see 11 NYCRR 65—1.1;
Integrative Pain Medicine, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51525(U) “Appearance at an EUO is a condition precedent to coverage (see 11 NYCRR 65—1.1;
TAM Med. Supply Corp. v Ameriprise Auto & Home, 2016 NY Slip Op 51407(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Plaintiff correctly argues that, because defendant failed to submit
Actual Chiropractic, P.C. v Mercury Cas. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51435(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “The proof submitted by defendant established that it had timely mailed
Jones v Seta, 2016 NY Slip Op 06556 (1st Dept. 2016) “Defendants’ discovery, after the filing of the note of issue, that Jones had been involved in
AVM Chiropractic, P.C. v 21st Century Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51354(U)(App, Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Contrary to plaintiff’s only arguments on appeal, the proof submitted
Liberty Mut. Insurance Co. v K.O. Med., P.C., 2016 NY Slip Op 06166 (1st Dept. 2016) Violation of 3.5(b); 3.6(b) (1) Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, a declaration
Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51026(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Plaintiff failed to allege, much less prove,
City Care Acupuncture, P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51036(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “[p]laintiffs’ assignor had failed to appear for an examination under
Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v Titan Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 26211 (Civ. Ct. Kings Co. 2016) The Court here stated the following: (1) “The only
Urban Well Acupuncture, P.C. v Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50906(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2016) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, defendant submitted competent evidence
Vladenn Med. Supply Corp. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50928(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “With respect to plaintiff’s contention that
IMA Acupuncture, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50926(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) Contrary to defendant’s contention, the affirmation submitted in support of
Avalon Radiology, PC. v Ameriprise Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 26182 (Dis. Ct. Suffolk Co. 2016) “Avalon responded to the first EUO request with a letter
New Quality Med., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50871(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) Defendant’s contention that its cross motion for summary judgment should
Vladenn Med. Supply, Corp. v American Commerce Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50775(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2016) “In this regard, we note that while the affirmation
Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v Metro Psychological Servs., P.C., 2016 NY Slip Op 03485 (2d Dept. 2016) Mass production is great when your systems properly account for
Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50698(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “We also reject plaintiff’s contention that defendant’s
GL Acupuncture, P.C. v Ameriprise Auto & Home, 2016 NY Slip Op 50377(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Because defendant failed to submit proof by someone with personal
Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v Hertz Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50371(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) **I am sure this was not Rubin, Fiorella’s Hertz case** By
Encompass Ins. Co. v Rockaway Family Med. Care, P.C., 2016 NY Slip Op 01921 (1st Dept. 2016) “Plaintiff’s second follow-up request for an examination under oath was
