The denial need not be authenticated as a busines record
Jesa Med. Supply, Inc. v NYC Tr. Auth., 2013 NY Slip Op 52007(U)(App. Ter 2d Dept. 2013) “Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, defendant was not required to
Jesa Med. Supply, Inc. v NYC Tr. Auth., 2013 NY Slip Op 52007(U)(App. Ter 2d Dept. 2013) “Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, defendant was not required to
Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v Donnelly, 2013 NY Slip Op 07283 (4th Dept. 2013) (1) CPLR 4518 (a) challenge: “We conclude that plaintiff met its initial burden
Colonia Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51266(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Plaintiff opposed defendant’s motion, arguing that the
All Borough Group Med. Supply, Inc. v Geico Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 23262 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “At the outset, we note that plaintiff
AR Med. Rehabilitation, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50510(U)(Civ. Ct. Kings Co. 2013) “The court finds that Dr. Rozenberg’s testimony was insufficient
JP Morgan Chase Bank v Shapiro, 2013 NY Slip Op 01357 (1st Dept. 2013) “The underlying mortgage and note were originally held by Washington Mutual Bank, FA
Hazzard v Burrowes, 2012 NY Slip Op 03409 (2d Dept. 2012) “Moreover, the police accident report was inadmissible, as it was not certified as a business
Westchester Med. Ctr. v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50398(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “In the case at bar, plaintiff’s submission of a
Hernandez v Tepan, 2012 NY Slip Op 01211 (2d Dept. 2012) “As the defendant correctly contends, the police accident report submitted by the plaintiff in support
When will certain Plaintiffs and their law firms realize that it is okay to occasionally lose in Civil Court. Look at the the mess that Plaintiff