Skip to main content
Understanding NYCRR 65-3.15: New York No-Fault Insurance Regulations Explained
Bicycle Accidents

Understanding NYCRR 65-3.15: New York No-Fault Insurance Regulations Explained

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Understanding NYCRR 65-3.15 and New York no-fault insurance regulations. Get expert legal help with policy exhaustion disputes. Call 516-750-0595 today.

This article is part of our ongoing bicycle accidents coverage, with 2 published articles analyzing bicycle accidents issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

When you are involved in a car accident in New York, understanding the complex web of no-fault insurance regulations can feel overwhelming. One critical regulation that frequently comes into play in insurance disputes is 11 NYCRR 65-3.15, which governs how insurance companies must handle policy exhaustion claims.

Recent Court Decision: DTR Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Refill Rx Pharm., Inc.

A recent case from 2023 provides valuable insight into how New York courts interpret these regulations. In Matter of DTR Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Refill Rx Pharm., Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 00179 (1st Dept. 2023), the court addressed whether an insurance company properly exhausted a policy before denying additional claims.

The Courts Finding

The court ruled that “Country-Wide was not precluded from raising the issue of policy exhaustion before the court, even if it was not before the arbitrators in the underlying arbitration (Matter of Ameriprise Ins. Co. at 564).”

Significantly, the court found that Country-Wide properly documented the policy exhaustion by submitting:

  • An affidavit from its No-Fault Litigation/Arbitration supervisor
  • Documentation showing that the instant claims file reflected the policy was exhausted beyond its $50,000 limit
  • A detailed ledger reflecting the dates that claims by various medical providers were paid, which exhausted Ms. Rosas policy

Thus, Country-Wides submissions showed that the policy was properly exhausted prior to the underlying arbitration (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.15).

As attorney Jason Tenenbaum notes: “Again, the issue as herein presented is whether the insurance complied with 3.15. It appears that did happen in this case.”

What is NYCRR 65-3.15?

NYCRR 65-3.15 is a New York State regulation that sets specific requirements for how no-fault insurance companies must handle and document policy exhaustion. This regulation is part of the broader framework governing New Yorks no-fault insurance system, which requires all drivers to carry personal injury protection (PIP) coverage.

Key Requirements Under the Regulation

The regulation mandates that insurance companies must:

  1. Maintain detailed records of all payments made against a policy
  2. Document the exhaustion process with specific dates and amounts
  3. Provide proper notice when a policy approaches its limits
  4. Follow prescribed procedures before denying claims based on policy exhaustion

Understanding New Yorks No-Fault Insurance System

New York operates under a no-fault insurance system, meaning that regardless of who caused an accident, each persons own insurance company initially pays for their medical expenses and other covered losses up to the policy limits.

Basic Coverage Requirements

Every New York driver must carry minimum no-fault coverage including:

  • $50,000 per person for medical expenses
  • $2,000 per month for up to three years for lost earnings (total of $72,000)
  • $2,000 per month for up to two years for other reasonable and necessary expenses

When Policies Become Exhausted

A no-fault insurance policy becomes “exhausted” when the total claims paid reach the policy limits. Once exhausted, the insurance company is no longer obligated to pay additional claims under that policy.

What This Means For You

If you have been injured in a car accident in New York, understanding NYCRR 65-3.15 can be crucial to protecting your rights:

If You are Dealing with Policy Exhaustion Claims

Document Everything: Keep detailed records of all medical treatments, expenses, and communications with your insurance company. This mirrors the documentation requirements that insurance companies must follow under NYCRR 65-3.15.

Verify the Exhaustion: Do not automatically accept an insurance companys claim that your policy is exhausted. As the Country-Wide case shows, companies must provide specific documentation including detailed ledgers showing exactly how and when the policy limits were reached.

Know Your Rights: If you believe your insurance company improperly claimed policy exhaustion, you have the right to challenge this determination. The company must be able to prove compliance with NYCRR 65-3.15.

Red Flags to Watch For

Be alert if your insurance company:

  • Claims policy exhaustion without providing detailed documentation
  • Cannot produce a clear ledger showing payment dates and amounts
  • Fails to provide proper notice as you approach policy limits
  • Denies claims without following proper procedures outlined in NYCRR 65-3.15

Options When Your Policy is Truly Exhausted

If your no-fault coverage has been legitimately exhausted, you still have options:

Pursue Claims Against At-Fault Parties

Once your no-fault benefits are exhausted, you may be able to pursue a traditional lawsuit against the at-fault driver for:

  • Additional medical expenses
  • Pain and suffering
  • Lost wages beyond no-fault limits
  • Other damages not covered by no-fault insurance

Underinsured Motorist Coverage

If you purchased underinsured motorist coverage, this may provide additional protection when your no-fault benefits run out.

Health Insurance Coordination

Your health insurance may cover medical expenses not paid by no-fault insurance, though there may be coordination of benefits issues to resolve.

Navigating no-fault insurance regulations like NYCRR 65-3.15 requires deep understanding of both the technical requirements and how courts interpret them. As shown in the Country-Wide case, success often depends on proper documentation and procedural compliance.

When to Contact an Attorney

Consider seeking legal help if:

  • Your insurance company claims policy exhaustion but will not provide documentation
  • You believe the exhaustion calculation is incorrect
  • You are facing denial of claims you believe should be covered
  • You need to pursue additional remedies beyond no-fault coverage

Frequently Asked Questions About NYCRR 65-3.15

Q: Can an insurance company deny my claim simply by saying my policy is exhausted?

A: No. Under NYCRR 65-3.15, insurance companies must provide specific documentation proving policy exhaustion, including detailed ledgers showing exactly how and when payments were made that reached the policy limits.

Q: What happens if my insurance company cannot prove proper exhaustion?

A: If the insurance company cannot demonstrate compliance with NYCRR 65-3.15s documentation requirements, they may be required to continue paying claims or face penalties for improper claim denial.

Q: How long do insurance companies have to provide exhaustion documentation?

A: The regulation requires prompt provision of documentation. If an insurance company claims exhaustion as a defense, they must be prepared to prove it with the required detailed records.

Q: Can I challenge a policy exhaustion determination in court?

A: Yes. As the Country-Wide case demonstrates, policy exhaustion determinations can be challenged in court, and insurance companies must prove they followed proper procedures under NYCRR 65-3.15.

Q: What should I do if I think my insurance company improperly claimed exhaustion?

A: Document your concerns, request detailed exhaustion documentation from the insurance company, and consider consulting with an experienced no-fault insurance attorney to review your case.

The Country-Wide case illustrates how technical compliance with regulations like NYCRR 65-3.15 can determine the outcome of insurance disputes. Having an attorney who understands both the regulatory requirements and how courts interpret them can make the difference between a denied claim and proper coverage.

At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, we have extensive experience handling no-fault insurance disputes, including challenges to improper policy exhaustion claims. We understand the complex interplay between New Yorks no-fault regulations and can help ensure insurance companies comply with their obligations under NYCRR 65-3.15.

Do not let insurance companies improperly deny your claims. If you are dealing with a policy exhaustion dispute or have questions about your no-fault insurance coverage, call 516-750-0595 for a free consultation. We will review your case and help you understand your rights under New Yorks no-fault insurance system.

The information in this article is based on New York law and regulations. Individual cases may vary, and this article does not constitute legal advice for any specific situation.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

Was this article helpful?

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.

24+ years in practice 1,000+ appeals written 100K+ no-fault cases $100M+ recovered

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a bicycle accidents matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filed under: Bicycle Accidents
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Legal Resources

Understanding New York Bicycle Accidents Law

New York has a unique legal landscape that affects how bicycle accidents cases are litigated and resolved. The state's court system includes the Civil Court (for claims up to $25,000), the Supreme Court (the primary trial court for unlimited jurisdiction), the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts), the Appellate Division (divided into four Departments, with the Second Department covering Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and several upstate counties), and the Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). Each court has its own procedural requirements, local rules, and case-assignment practices that can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

For bicycle accidents matters on Long Island, cases are typically filed in Nassau County Supreme Court (at the courthouse in Mineola) or Suffolk County Supreme Court (in Riverhead). No-fault arbitrations are heard through the American Arbitration Association, which assigns arbitrators throughout the metropolitan area. Workers' compensation claims go to the Workers' Compensation Board, with hearings at district offices across the state. Understanding which forum is appropriate for your case — and the specific procedural rules that apply — is essential for a successful outcome.

The procedural landscape in New York also includes important timing requirements that can affect your case. Most civil actions are subject to statutes of limitations ranging from one year (for intentional torts and claims against municipalities) to six years (for contract actions). Personal injury cases generally have a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5), while medical malpractice claims must be filed within two and a half years under CPLR 214-a. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including 30-day filing requirements for applications and 45-day deadlines for provider claims. Understanding and complying with these deadlines is critical — missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case may be on the merits.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum regularly practices in all of these venues. His office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, NY 11746, is centrally located on Long Island, providing convenient access to courts and offices throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City. Whether you need representation in a no-fault arbitration, a personal injury trial, an employment discrimination hearing, or an appeal to the Appellate Division, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. brings $24+ years of real courtroom experience to your case. If you have questions about the legal issues discussed in this article, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, no-obligation consultation.

New York's substantive law also presents distinct challenges. In motor vehicle cases, the no-fault system under Insurance Law Article 51 provides first-party benefits regardless of fault, but limits the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the plaintiff establishes a "serious injury" under one of nine statutory categories. This threshold — codified at Insurance Law Section 5102(d) — requires medical evidence showing more than a minor or subjective injury, and courts have developed detailed standards for each category. Fractures must be documented through imaging studies. Claims of permanent consequential limitation or significant limitation of use require quantified range-of-motion testing with comparison to norms. The 90/180-day category demands proof that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident.

In employment discrimination cases, the legal standards vary depending on whether the claim arises under state or local law. The New York State Human Rights Law employs a burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by showing membership in a protected class, qualification for the position, an adverse employment action, and circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision. If the employer meets this burden, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the stated reason is pretextual. The New York City Human Rights Law, by contrast, applies a broader standard, asking whether the plaintiff was treated less well than other employees because of a protected characteristic.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review