The First Department's newest inconsistent position on 2309
Green v Fairway Operating Corp., 2010 NY Slip Op 03481 (1st Dept. 2010) “The affidavit of plaintiff’s witness, purportedly sworn to in the Dominican Republic, lacks
Green v Fairway Operating Corp., 2010 NY Slip Op 03481 (1st Dept. 2010) “The affidavit of plaintiff’s witness, purportedly sworn to in the Dominican Republic, lacks
It is rare to see a 5102(d) case, which has broad implications in various areas of law, find a probable trip to the Court of Appeals.
A.B. Med. Servs., PLLC v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50702(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “Plaintiffs’ prior action was dismissed
“Furthermore, the computerized range-of-motion tests referred to in Dr. Dudelzak’s affirmations were not in admissible form because they were not affirmed by someone with personal knowledge
Palisades Collection Co., LLC v Velazquez, 2010 NY Slip Op 50675(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2010) In this action to recover a credit card debt, plaintiff’s evidence
Riu Chiropractic, P.C. v AutoOne Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50653(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and in
Park Slope Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20131 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “While the motion for summary
Park Slope Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20131 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “While the motion for summary
Bauman v Mount Sinai Hosp., 2010 NY Slip Op 03034 (1st Dept. 2010). I am glad I got your attention. Read the bold portion of the
I thought this issue was resolved a long time ago: 3212(a) applies to the lower courts as well as Supreme Court. Here are some examples holding
In another care where I was the Respondent – I sometimes win these motions in the Civil Courts – Plaintiff appealed the finding of the Civil
In another care where I was the Respondent – I sometimes win these motions in the Civil Courts – Plaintiff appealed the finding of the Civil