Not nice.
August 18, 2011
No Comments
Gateway Med., P.C. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51533(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “As it is uncontroverted that service of process was not
Gateway Med., P.C. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51533(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “As it is uncontroverted that service of process was not
New Millennium Psychological Servs., P.C. v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 21240 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “Plaintiff argues that the “affidavit” of
Manhattan Med. Imaging, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51230(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In opposition to the motion,
Anoun v City of New York, 2011 NY Slip Op 05638 (1st Dept. 2011) Deny, Deny, Deny and do not withdraw those affirmative defenses. Well, only
Omega Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC, 2011 NY Slip Op 50867(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault
St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 01828 (2d Dept. 2011) “The plaintiff, St. Vincent’s Hospital &
Well, Country Wide got away with this once. St. Barnabas Hosp. v. Country Wide Ins. Co., 79 A.D.3d 732 (2d Dept. 2010): “We note that, in
“Jack be nimble Jack be quick, jack go under limbo stick”. “Limbo Rock Jive” by Brave Combo. What happens when a case is marked off the
B.Y., M.D., P.C. v GEICO Indem. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50036(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) For those who practice in the outer lying areas of
The 3212(g) effect. Limiting issues for trial. According to Professor Siegel, 3212(g) is the remnants of “the aborted motion for summary judgment.” This provision is a