Partner's affirmation demonstrated the "no-show" component of an EUO no-show defense
Crotona Hgts. Med., P.C. v Farm Family Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50716(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion and in
Crotona Hgts. Med., P.C. v Farm Family Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50716(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion and in
St. Vincent Med. Care, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50446(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “While defendant properly argues that an EUO need
RLC Med., P.C. v Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 52691(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) “Defendant denied Craigg’s $269.60 claim based upon
There has been a lot of activity on the Supreme Court front, in the realm of declaratory judgment actions, as to whether a insurance carrier must
W & Z Acupuncture, P.C. v Amex Assur. Co. 2009 NY Slip Op 51732(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion and in support
The Appellate Term, Second Department seems to be all over the place with the “EUO” cases. The analysis is really needlessly strained and hard to follow.