Additional Verification non-receipt
Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50958(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “In this action by a provider to recover
Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50958(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “In this action by a provider to recover
Global Liberty Ins. Co. v Jonathan Lewin, M.D., P.C., 2017 NY Slip Op 50897(U)(Sup. Ct. Nassau Co. 2017) Here are the cliff note facts. Carrier delayed surgical
Excel Surgery Ctr., L.L.C. v Fiduciary Ins. Co. of Am., 2017 NY Slip Op 50408(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “[i]n response to defendant’s verification requests, plaintiff informed
St. Barnabas Hosp. v Government Employees Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 27056 (2d Dept. 2017) (1) “The Plaintiff’s position that the verification request was improper because
Advantage Radiology, P.C. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.. 2017 NY Slip Op 27061 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Plaintiff’s contention that, pursuant to 11 NYCRR 65-3.6 (b),
Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50101(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) I recall prior to heading to a miscellaneous part in
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Longevity Medical Supply, Inc., 2272/16 (Civ. Ct. NY Co. 2016) This case was sent to me from Steven F. Palumbom Esq., of
TAM Med. Supply Corp. v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51532(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) TAM Med. Supply Corp. v National Liab.
Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v Auto One Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51443(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) These were affidavits I inherited from prior
Compas Med., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51441(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, defendant was not required to pay or
“Defendant also established that the assignor had failed to appear for the duly scheduled IMEs (see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35
Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50910(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “In support of the cross motion, defendant established
Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50858(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) This is my plea to those at the Appellate
Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51776(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “However, in opposition to the cross motion, plaintiff submitted an affidavit
New Way Acupuncture, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51706(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “A review of defendant’s letters reveals
Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co.,2015 NY Slip Op 51699(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) However, in opposition to the cross motion, plaintiff submitted an affidavit
New Way Med. Supply Corp. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51678(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “In support of the branch of
New Way Med. Supply Corp. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51632(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “However, in opposition to the cross motion, plaintiff submitted
Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51467(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “The Civil Court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted the branch of defendant’s
Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51403(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “In support of the branch of defendant’s cross motion seeking summary