Skip to main content
Another priority of payment?
No-Fault

Another priority of payment?

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Understanding NY no-fault priority of payment rules and how they affect your medical bills. Expert legal analysis. Call 516-750-0595 for consultation.

This article is part of our ongoing no-fault coverage, with 271 published articles analyzing no-fault issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

Understanding No-Fault Priority of Payment Rules in New York

When you’re injured in a car accident in New York, the priority of payment regulations under no-fault insurance determine which medical bills get paid first when insurance coverage is limited. A recent appellate case highlights the ongoing complexity and confusion surrounding these rules, even among courts tasked with interpreting them.

The Advantage Radiology Case: A Judicial Puzzle

Advantage Radiology, P.C. v MVAIC, 2023 NY Slip Op 50139(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2023)

“Defendant’s submission on its summary judgment motion revealed the existence of triable issues of fact concerning whether defendant exhausted the coverage limits by payments to other providers and to the assignor for lost wages, and whether such payments were made in compliance with the priority of payment regulations (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.15; see generally New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co., 12 AD3d 579 ; Harmonic Physical Therapy, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 47 Misc 3d 137, 2015 NY Slip Op 50525 ; cf. Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Metro Pain Specialists P.C., — AD3d —, 2022 NY Slip Op 06865 ).”

No matter how many times I read this case, it just does not make sense to me. How can a court apply 65-3.15 and yet cite to Harmonic Physical Therapy? One of life’s great mysteries.

This observation highlights a fundamental problem in New York’s no-fault system: the inconsistent application of priority of payment rules creates uncertainty for accident victims, medical providers, and attorneys alike.

What Are Priority of Payment Rules?

Priority of payment regulations, found in 11 NYCRR 65-3.15, establish the order in which no-fault insurance benefits must be paid when coverage limits are exhausted. These rules were designed to ensure fairness and prevent certain providers or types of expenses from consuming all available benefits while leaving others unpaid.

The Basic Framework

Under New York’s no-fault system, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage provides up to $50,000 per person for:

  • Medical expenses
  • Lost wages (up to $2,000 per month for three years)
  • Essential services expenses
  • Death benefits

When claims exceed the $50,000 limit, the priority rules determine which expenses get paid first and which may go unpaid.

How Priority of Payment Works in Practice

The priority system creates a hierarchy of payment obligations that insurance companies must follow. However, the practical application of these rules often leads to disputes between insurance companies, medical providers, and accident victims.

First Priority: Basic Economic Loss

The highest priority typically goes to basic economic loss, which includes essential medical treatment and a portion of lost wages. This ensures that accident victims can access necessary medical care and maintain some level of income replacement.

Subsequent Priorities

After basic economic needs are addressed, the regulations establish additional priority levels for:

  • Additional medical expenses
  • Remaining wage replacement
  • Essential services replacement
  • Other covered expenses

The Reality of Limited Coverage

With only $50,000 in total coverage available, serious accidents often result in claims that far exceed this limit. Emergency room treatment, hospital stays, surgery, rehabilitation, and ongoing care can quickly exhaust available benefits, leaving some providers and expenses unpaid.

What This Means For You: Practical Implications

Understanding priority of payment rules is crucial for anyone involved in a serious car accident in New York. These rules can significantly impact which of your medical bills get paid and which may become your personal responsibility.

If You’re an Accident Victim

The priority rules can affect your access to ongoing medical care and your financial responsibility for unpaid bills. If your no-fault coverage is exhausted:

  • Medical providers may stop treatment: Providers who know they’re low on the priority list may refuse to continue treatment without payment guarantees.
  • You may become personally liable: Unpaid medical bills don’t just disappear when no-fault benefits are exhausted.
  • Collection actions may follow: Providers may pursue collection efforts against you personally for unpaid balances.
  • Credit impacts are possible: Unpaid medical bills can affect your credit rating.

Strategic Considerations for Medical Treatment

When no-fault coverage may be limited, strategic decisions about medical treatment become important:

  • Prioritize essential care: Focus on necessary treatment that qualifies for higher priority payment.
  • Document medical necessity: Ensure all treatment is properly documented as medically necessary.
  • Consider alternative coverage: Explore whether health insurance or other coverage may apply.
  • Understand provider policies: Know which providers will continue treatment when no-fault benefits are exhausted.

Priority of payment disputes frequently arise in no-fault cases, creating complex legal battles that can delay payment to providers and create uncertainty for accident victims.

Exhaustion of Benefits Issues

Insurance companies often claim they’ve properly exhausted benefits according to priority rules, while providers argue that payments were made incorrectly or out of proper sequence. The Advantage Radiology case exemplifies this type of dispute.

Waiver of Priority Defense

Courts have found that insurance companies can waive their right to assert priority of payment defenses if they fail to raise them properly or timely. This creates additional complexity in determining whether priority rules apply in specific cases.

Regulatory Interpretation Conflicts

As demonstrated by the judicial inconsistency in citing both current regulations and conflicting precedents, courts sometimes struggle with the proper interpretation and application of priority rules.

The Provider’s Perspective

Medical providers face significant challenges under the priority of payment system, which can impact their willingness to treat accident victims and the quality of care available.

Financial Risks for Providers

Providers must often make treatment decisions without knowing whether they’ll ultimately be paid, as priority determinations may not be clear until all claims are submitted and reviewed.

Assignment of Benefits Issues

Many providers accept assignment of benefits from patients, meaning they agree to bill the insurance company directly rather than requiring payment from the patient. However, priority rules can leave assigned providers unpaid even when they’ve provided necessary care.

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding priority of payment requires familiarity with key cases and regulations that shape how these rules are applied.

Key Regulations

11 NYCRR 65-3.15 provides the detailed framework for priority of payment, but its interaction with other regulations and case law creates complexity that even experienced practitioners find challenging.

Significant Case Law

Cases like New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Allstate Insurance Co. and Harmonic Physical Therapy v. Praetorian Insurance Co. have shaped how courts interpret priority rules, though as the Advantage Radiology case demonstrates, consistent application remains elusive.

Protecting Your Rights and Interests

Whether you’re an accident victim or a medical provider, understanding your rights under priority of payment rules is essential for protecting your interests.

For Accident Victims

If you’re involved in a serious accident that may exhaust your no-fault coverage:

  • Seek legal advice early: Understanding priority implications can help guide treatment decisions.
  • Maintain detailed records: Keep comprehensive records of all medical treatment and expenses.
  • Understand your insurance coverage: Know what coverage you have beyond no-fault benefits.
  • Consider third-party claims: If another driver was at fault, you may have claims beyond no-fault benefits.

For Medical Providers

Providers should:

  • Understand assignment risks: Know the financial risks of accepting assignment of benefits.
  • Monitor coverage limits: Track patients’ remaining no-fault coverage.
  • Document medical necessity: Ensure treatment meets regulatory requirements for coverage.
  • Consider payment arrangements: Establish clear policies for patients whose no-fault coverage is exhausted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if my no-fault coverage is exhausted before all my medical bills are paid?

Unpaid medical bills may become your personal responsibility, though you may have other insurance coverage or legal claims that could help. It’s important to consult with an attorney to understand your options.

Can insurance companies choose which bills to pay when coverage is limited?

No, insurance companies must follow the priority of payment regulations. They cannot arbitrarily choose which bills to pay. However, disputes often arise about whether the proper priorities were followed.

How can I tell if my insurance company is following priority of payment rules correctly?

This requires detailed analysis of your claims, payments made, and applicable regulations. An experienced no-fault attorney can review your case to determine whether proper priorities were followed.

What should I do if my medical provider says they won’t continue treatment because my no-fault coverage is exhausted?

First, verify that coverage is actually exhausted and that payments were made in proper priority order. Consider whether other insurance coverage might apply. If you have potential third-party claims, discuss options with an attorney.

Can priority of payment rules be waived?

Yes, courts have found that insurance companies can waive their right to assert priority defenses if they fail to raise them properly. However, this is a complex legal issue that requires professional analysis.

Priority of payment disputes represent some of the most complex issues in New York’s no-fault system. The judicial confusion demonstrated in the Advantage Radiology case shows that even courts struggle with consistent application of these rules.

At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, we have extensive experience handling priority of payment disputes for both accident victims and medical providers. We understand the intricate interplay between regulations, case law, and practical application that makes these cases so challenging.

Our Approach to Priority Cases

Our no-fault insurance attorneys provide comprehensive analysis of:

  • Whether proper payment priorities were followed
  • Available coverage beyond no-fault benefits
  • Potential third-party liability claims
  • Strategies to maximize recovery for unpaid expenses

We work closely with our personal injury team to ensure that all potential sources of recovery are explored and pursued.

Don’t Navigate Priority Disputes Alone

The complexity and inconsistency in priority of payment law means that having experienced legal representation is essential. Whether you’re facing unpaid medical bills due to exhausted no-fault coverage, or you’re a provider seeking payment for services rendered, we can help you understand your rights and options.

Priority of payment disputes can have significant financial implications and may affect your ability to access necessary medical care. Don’t let insurance companies take advantage of the system’s complexity to avoid their payment obligations.

Call 516-750-0595 for a free consultation to discuss your priority of payment issue. We’ll review your case, explain your rights, and develop a strategy to protect your interests. We work on a contingency fee basis for personal injury claims, so you don’t pay attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York's no-fault insurance system, established under Insurance Law Article 51, is one of the most complex insurance frameworks in the country. Every motorist must carry Personal Injury Protection coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of fault, up to $50,000 per person.

But insurers routinely deny valid claims using peer reviews, EUO scheduling tactics, fee schedule reductions, and coverage defenses. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has handled over 100,000 no-fault cases since 2002 — from initial claim submissions through arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, trials in Civil Court and Supreme Court, and appeals to the Appellate Term and Appellate Division. Jason Tenenbaum is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

His 2,353+ published legal articles on no-fault practice are cited by attorneys throughout New York. Whether you are dealing with a medical necessity denial, an EUO no-show defense, a fee schedule dispute, or a coverage question, this article provides the kind of detailed case-law analysis that helps practitioners and claimants understand exactly where the law stands.

About This Topic

New York No-Fault Insurance Law

New York's no-fault insurance system requires every driver to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of who caused the accident. But insurers routinely deny, delay, and underpay valid claims — using peer reviews, IME no-shows, and fee schedule defenses to avoid paying providers and injured claimants. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has litigated thousands of no-fault arbitrations and court cases since 2002.

271 published articles in No-Fault

Keep Reading

More No-Fault Analysis

View all No-Fault articles

Was this article helpful?

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.

24+ years in practice 1,000+ appeals written 100K+ no-fault cases $100M+ recovered

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a no-fault matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filed under: No-Fault
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Legal Resources

Understanding New York No-Fault Law

New York has a unique legal landscape that affects how no-fault cases are litigated and resolved. The state's court system includes the Civil Court (for claims up to $25,000), the Supreme Court (the primary trial court for unlimited jurisdiction), the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts), the Appellate Division (divided into four Departments, with the Second Department covering Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and several upstate counties), and the Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). Each court has its own procedural requirements, local rules, and case-assignment practices that can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

For no-fault matters on Long Island, cases are typically filed in Nassau County Supreme Court (at the courthouse in Mineola) or Suffolk County Supreme Court (in Riverhead). No-fault arbitrations are heard through the American Arbitration Association, which assigns arbitrators throughout the metropolitan area. Workers' compensation claims go to the Workers' Compensation Board, with hearings at district offices across the state. Understanding which forum is appropriate for your case — and the specific procedural rules that apply — is essential for a successful outcome.

The procedural landscape in New York also includes important timing requirements that can affect your case. Most civil actions are subject to statutes of limitations ranging from one year (for intentional torts and claims against municipalities) to six years (for contract actions). Personal injury cases generally have a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5), while medical malpractice claims must be filed within two and a half years under CPLR 214-a. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including 30-day filing requirements for applications and 45-day deadlines for provider claims. Understanding and complying with these deadlines is critical — missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case may be on the merits.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum regularly practices in all of these venues. His office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, NY 11746, is centrally located on Long Island, providing convenient access to courts and offices throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City. Whether you need representation in a no-fault arbitration, a personal injury trial, an employment discrimination hearing, or an appeal to the Appellate Division, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. brings $24+ years of real courtroom experience to your case. If you have questions about the legal issues discussed in this article, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, no-obligation consultation.

New York's substantive law also presents distinct challenges. In motor vehicle cases, the no-fault system under Insurance Law Article 51 provides first-party benefits regardless of fault, but limits the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the plaintiff establishes a "serious injury" under one of nine statutory categories. This threshold — codified at Insurance Law Section 5102(d) — requires medical evidence showing more than a minor or subjective injury, and courts have developed detailed standards for each category. Fractures must be documented through imaging studies. Claims of permanent consequential limitation or significant limitation of use require quantified range-of-motion testing with comparison to norms. The 90/180-day category demands proof that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident.

In employment discrimination cases, the legal standards vary depending on whether the claim arises under state or local law. The New York State Human Rights Law employs a burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by showing membership in a protected class, qualification for the position, an adverse employment action, and circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision. If the employer meets this burden, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the stated reason is pretextual. The New York City Human Rights Law, by contrast, applies a broader standard, asking whether the plaintiff was treated less well than other employees because of a protected characteristic.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review