East Coast Acupuncture, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51229(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “With respect to the unpaid portions of the
Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 2011 NY Slip Op 76777 (2011) I was right on this one. I am waiting for the
Crescent Radiology, PLLC v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50622(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “The papers substantiate the basis for the EUO request.
Urban Radiology, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50601(U),2011 NY Slip Op 50601(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “the Civil Court denied plaintiff’s
Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 2011 NY Slip Op 01948 (1st Dept. 2011) I would consider this matter the most precedential no-fault
GLM Med., P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50194(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) In an affront to those who have
Dover Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51605(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2010) The Appellate Term, First Department, which many
Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51455(U)(App.Term 2d Dept. 2010) You have seem this before. “Contrary to the Civil
Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51338(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) Part I: “[c]ontrary to the finding of the
Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51334(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “To raise a triable issue of fact based on
Dynamic Med. Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20285 (Dis. Nassau 2010) I am somewhat flabbergasted at this decision.
Crotona Hgts. Med., P.C. v Farm Family Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50716(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion and in
St. Vincent Med. Care, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50446(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “While defendant properly argues that an EUO need
RLC Med., P.C. v Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 52691(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) “Defendant denied Craigg’s $269.60 claim based upon
There has been a lot of activity on the Supreme Court front, in the realm of declaratory judgment actions, as to whether a insurance carrier must
W & Z Acupuncture, P.C. v Amex Assur. Co. 2009 NY Slip Op 51732(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion and in support
The Appellate Term, Second Department seems to be all over the place with the “EUO” cases. The analysis is really needlessly strained and hard to follow.
