80% of the billed amount can be
Florida appeals court ruling on Progressive vs Back on Track regarding 80% PIP reimbursement rates and statutory schedule of maximum charges interpretation.
Read More →19 articles published in July 2022
Florida appeals court ruling on Progressive vs Back on Track regarding 80% PIP reimbursement rates and statutory schedule of maximum charges interpretation.
Read More →Explore two avenues of reimbursement in no-fault insurance: fee schedules vs. reasonable and customary charges. Florida court ruling on expert testimony methodology.
Read More →Florida court rules that record keeping violations don't justify denying claims when treatments are medically reasonable and necessary, protecting patient access to care.
Read More →Florida court case examining the English Rule of priority between competing assignees in no-fault insurance claims, distinguishing assignees from insureds in payment order disputes.
Read More →Florida's demanding pre-suit requirements for PIP claims now require precision in demand letters, moving beyond substantial compliance to exact amounts.
Read More →Florida's 35-day billing submission rule compared to NY's 45-day requirement - appellate court ruling against providers and strategic considerations for attorneys.
Read More →New Jersey court rules insurance carriers cannot sue attorneys for "overpaid" PIP fees under IFPA when payments were regulatory penalties, not policy benefits.
Read More →Learn about Ins Law 5106(c) trial de novo proceedings in NY no-fault insurance disputes. Expert insights on litigation strategy and settlement tactics.
Read More →New York no-fault case shows how healthcare providers can justify failure to comply with insurance verification requests during claims processing.
Read More →New York court ruling shows insurance companies must properly prove policy exhaustion claims with adequate foundation for payment records under CPLR 4518.
Read More →Court decision analyzing EUO no-show affirmations in no-fault insurance cases, questioning sufficiency standards under Parisien v Ameriprise ruling.
Read More →Court rules State Farm properly paid acupuncture claims using workers' compensation fee schedule for chiropractor services under New York no-fault insurance law.
Read More →Court rules medical provider failed to justify submitting no-fault claim to wrong insurer, despite claim form allegedly bearing correct carrier's information.
Read More →Learn how mutual rescheduling of EUOs can impact disclaimer timeliness in NY no-fault cases. Court ruling shows risks when insurers can't prove mutual rescheduling occurred.
Read More →Court rules healthcare providers cannot demand $5,000 upfront payment as condition for attending examinations under oath in no-fault insurance cases.
Read More →Court ruling on no-fault insurance benefits case where plaintiff successfully obtained summary judgment for unpaid medical bills totaling $44,573.86.
Read More →New York court ruling warns insurance companies against rescheduling EUOs after second no-shows, potentially waiving denial rights in no-fault claims.
Read More →Court denies forum non conveniens motion in NY no-fault case due to inadmissible hearsay evidence and procedural defects in proof presentation.
Read More →State Farm v Burke Physical Therapy case analysis on post-EUO document demands and verification requirements under New York no-fault insurance law.
Read More →Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.