The destruction of peer hearsay: It is not hearsay – and much more
Urban Radiology, P.C. v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50987(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This case really should be in the misc.3d reporter
Urban Radiology, P.C. v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50987(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This case really should be in the misc.3d reporter
Marmer v IF USA Express, Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 04151 (2d Dept. 2010) “Further, the unsigned deposition transcript of the plaintiff, which the defendants submitted
“It is well established that “ [a] denial of a motion for summary judgment is not necessarily res judicata or the law of the case that
Rivera v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 03773 (1st Dept. 2010) “Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, which was made in response to
Green v Fairway Operating Corp., 2010 NY Slip Op 03481 (1st Dept. 2010) “The affidavit of plaintiff’s witness, purportedly sworn to in the Dominican Republic, lacks
It is rare to see a 5102(d) case, which has broad implications in various areas of law, find a probable trip to the Court of Appeals.
A.B. Med. Servs., PLLC v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50702(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “Plaintiffs’ prior action was dismissed
“Furthermore, the computerized range-of-motion tests referred to in Dr. Dudelzak’s affirmations were not in admissible form because they were not affirmed by someone with personal knowledge
Palisades Collection Co., LLC v Velazquez, 2010 NY Slip Op 50675(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2010) In this action to recover a credit card debt, plaintiff’s evidence
Riu Chiropractic, P.C. v AutoOne Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50653(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and in