EUOs
May 20, 2019 No Comments
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50759(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” Furthermore, defendant was not required to set forth
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50759(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” Furthermore, defendant was not required to set forth
LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Automotive Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50696(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” Furthermore, defendant was not required to
First Class Med., P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50477(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) “The initial EUO scheduling letter resulted in a toll
Actual Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Ins., 2019 NY Slip Op 50421(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, defendant was not required to
Bronx Chiropractic Care, P.C. v State Farm Ins., 2019 NY Slip Op 50423(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) “The record reflects that plaintiff, in effect, objected to
Dynamic Balance Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Ins., 2019 NY Slip Op 50171(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) This continues the line of cases where the Appellate
Stracar Med. Servs. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51759(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) (1) “Plaintiff does not dispute that a letter
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs.; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51773(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Furthermore, defendant was not required to
Acupuncture Now, P.C. v American Commerce Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51768(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “However, plaintiff correctly argues that defendant failed to demonstrate that
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51653(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Furthermore, defendant was not required to
Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51552(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “To establish its prima facie entitlement to
Hertz Vehicles, LLC v Best Touch PT, P.C.,2018 NY Slip Op 04854 (1st Dept. 2018) (1) “Plaintiff failed to meet its burden of filing “proof of
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50864(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contentions, the proof submitted by defendant in
Parisien v Maya Assur. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50771(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Plaintiff correctly argues on appeal that the affidavit submitted by defendant in support
Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v Metlife Auto & Home, 2018 NY Slip Op 50772(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Plaintiff correctly argues on appeal that defendant failed
Healthway Med. Care, P.C. v American Commerce Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50733(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “However, plaintiff correctly argues on appeal that defendant failed
Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v All of NY, Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op 00810 (1st Dept. 2018) In the approximately 10 years, since Unitrin brought the notion
Hertz Vehs. LLC v Significant Care, PT, P.C., 2018 NY Slip Op 00456 (1st Dept. 2018) The affidavit of the Hertz claims handler personally assigned to this
Acupuncture Healthcare Plaza I, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50939(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) I think I failed to specifically comment on
Recover Med. Servs., P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51892(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) Upon review of my blog, I failed to note
