Shur v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51011(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Here, the affirmed report of the doctor who had performed an independent
Aliosha v Ostad, 2017 NY Slip Op 06055 (2d Dept. 2017) “In attempting to refute the opinion of the defendant’s expert regarding good blood flow to
Frank v Gengler, 2017 NY Slip Op 04423 (2d Dept. 2017) “Here, the Supreme Court erred in determining that the jury verdict in favor of the
Lee v Rodriguez, 2017 NY Slip Op 03869 (1st Dept. 2017) “They also submitted evidence that plaintiffs neither reported any injury to the police immediately after the
Matter of DTG Operations, Inc. v Travelers Indem. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 08967 (1st Dept. 2016) This looks like a case where the Petitioner was fighting
Hojun Hwang v Doe, 2016 NY Slip Op 07610 (1st Dept. 2016) (1) “Defendant made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury
Bobbio v Amboy Bus Co. Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 07101 (1st Dept. 2016) (1) “[defendant] found no objective neurological disability or permanency and full range of motion
Jones v MTA Bus Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 08915 (1st Dept. 2014) As for plaintiff’s other claimed injuries, defendants met their burden by relying on
Sanchez v Draper, 2014 NY Slip Op 08584 (1st Dept,. 2014) “Plaintiff also submitted certified medical records of the physical therapy and chiropractic treatment he started receiving
Vargas v Marte, 2014 NY Slip Op 08561 (2d Dept. 2014) Triable issue of fact on causation “In particular, plaintiff’s surgeon, recognizing that plaintiff had sustained a
