Hernandez v Marcano, 2018 NY Slip Op 03816 (1st Dept. 2018) However, in any event, defendants Marcano and Crescent Cab Corp.’s expert found full range of motion
Galluccio v Grossman, 2018 NY Slip Op 03664 (2d Dept. 2018) “In opposition, the affirmation of the plaintiffs’ expert failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Campbell v Drammeh, 2018 NY Slip Op 03643 (1st Dept. 2018) In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to his claimed spinal injuries,
Cooper v Nestoros, 2018 NY Slip Op 01716 (4th Dept. 2018) “Plaintiff’s chiropractor testified that, based on that history, he did not believe that plaintiff had suffered
CASE #1 Latus v Ishtarq, 2018 NY Slip Op 01417 (1st Dept. 2018) (1) “Plaintiff’s medical records demonstrated prima facie that plaintiff ceased treatment five months after
Sanchez v Oxcin, 2018 NY Slip Op 00343 (1st Dept. 2018) “The orthopedic surgeon also measured contemporaneous and continuing limitations, and opined that the cervical spine injury
Eason v Blacker, 2017 NY Slip Op 07674 (3d Dept. 2017) This is an important case because it really gives the defendant who obtains the correct records
Dovberg v Laubach, 2017 NY Slip Op 07238 (2d Dept. 2017) (1) “Prior to the commencement of a trial on the issue of damages, the defendants served
Shur v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51011(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Here, the affirmed report of the doctor who had performed an independent
Aliosha v Ostad, 2017 NY Slip Op 06055 (2d Dept. 2017) “In attempting to refute the opinion of the defendant’s expert regarding good blood flow to
Frank v Gengler, 2017 NY Slip Op 04423 (2d Dept. 2017) “Here, the Supreme Court erred in determining that the jury verdict in favor of the
Lee v Rodriguez, 2017 NY Slip Op 03869 (1st Dept. 2017) “They also submitted evidence that plaintiffs neither reported any injury to the police immediately after the
