Failure to appear may not result in dismissal with prejudice
Farrell Forwarding Co., Inc. v Alison Transp., Inc., 2014 NY Slip Op 05507 (2d Dept. 2014) “After the plaintiff failed to appear at a court-ordered conference,
Farrell Forwarding Co., Inc. v Alison Transp., Inc., 2014 NY Slip Op 05507 (2d Dept. 2014) “After the plaintiff failed to appear at a court-ordered conference,
DJS Med. Supplies, Inc. v Infinity Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52073(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) ‘Plaintiff commenced this action in April 2006 to recover
Gurin v Pogge, 2013 NY Slip Op 08174 (3d Dept. 2013) “In November 2011, defendants moved to vacate the default judgment, putting in dispute the contents of
Taveras v Philibert, 2013 NY Slip Op 04420 (1st Dept. 2013) “The motion court properly denied plaintiffs’ CPLR 5015(a)(1) motion to vacate the prior order, granted on
Manhattan Telecom. Corp. v H & A Locksmith, Inc., 2013 NY Slip Op 03867 (2013) “On November 5, 2009, Vanunu moved to vacate the judgment, asserting that
City Dental Servs., P.C. v Country Wide Ins. Co.,2013 NY Slip Op 50474(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In this action by a provider to recover assigned
D & r Med. Supply, Inc. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50785(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012). “In this action by a provider
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Young, 2012 NY Slip Op 50686(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “Upon defendants’ default in answering or appearing, an inquest
Rally Chiropractic, P.C. v MVAIC, 2012 NY Slip Op 50325(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) The record shows that defendant’s failure to appear at the compliance conference
Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v QBE Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51455(U)(App. Term 2d Dept., 2011) “In support of its motion, plaintiff proffered neither a
Omega Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC, 2011 NY Slip Op 50867(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault
Pena-Vazquez v Beharry, 2011 NY Slip Op 02462 (1st Dept. 2011) “In any event, the settlement discussions between plaintiffs and defendants’ insurer constitute a reasonable excuse