Maragos v Sakurai, 2012 NY Slip Op 01592 (2d Dept. 2012) “CPLR 3212(b) requires that a motion for summary judgment must be supported by, among other
Woodward Med. Rehabilitation, P.C. v State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 52442(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) In this case, which seems to
The 3212(g) effect. Limiting issues for trial. According to Professor Siegel, 3212(g) is the remnants of “the aborted motion for summary judgment.” This provision is a
VIT Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51560(U)(Civ. Ct. Kings Co. 2010) The Civil Court found, not surprisingly, that CPLR
Urban Radiology, P.C. v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50987(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This case really should be in the misc.3d reporter
Leonardi v Cruz, 2010 NY Slip Op 04257 (1sr Dept. 2010) “Furthermore, although “[a] cross motion for summary judgment made after the expiration of the statutory
Leonardi v Cruz, 2010 NY Slip Op 04257 (1sr Dept. 2010) “Furthermore, although “[a] cross motion for summary judgment made after the expiration of the statutory
Rivera v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 03773 (1st Dept. 2010) “Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, which was made in response to
Palisades Collection Co., LLC v Velazquez, 2010 NY Slip Op 50675(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2010) In this action to recover a credit card debt, plaintiff’s evidence
Riu Chiropractic, P.C. v AutoOne Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50653(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and in
I thought this issue was resolved a long time ago: 3212(a) applies to the lower courts as well as Supreme Court. Here are some examples holding
Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 2010 NY Slip Op 02743 (2d Dept. 2010) “[t]he case law is somewhat more abundant as to what is not “documentary
