Triangle R Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51663(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) “In this action by plaintiff to
MSSA Corp. v Redland Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51606(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011). A case more remarkable for Justice Steinhardt’s dissent: “In the instant
Neomy Med., P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51532(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In support of its cross motion for summary judgment, defendant
Prospect Medical, PC v. PLIGA, 2011 WL 2462643 (NJAD 2011) “Prospect Medical submitted claims for $18,168.68 for three MUAs performed on July 8, 9, and 10,
New York and Presbyterian Hosp. v. Selective Ins. Co. of America, 43 A.D.3d 1019 (2d Dept. 2007) Affidavit insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact
Devonshire Surgical Facility, Carnegie Hill Orthopedic Servs., P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50513(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 20110 “Even assuming that defendant
Consolidated Imaging P.C. (Rafailova) v Travelers Indem. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50159(U)(Civ Ct. Richmond Co. 2011) I did not miss this case. I just avoid
Pomona Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50276(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) “[t]he report of defendant’s peer review doctor, which relied
Park Slope Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50188(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “[p]laintiff submitted an affirmation of its
Mahmood v Vicks, 2011 NY Slip Op 00653 (2d Dept. 2011) Call this one: why an MRI performed more than 6 weeks after the MVA is
Enko Enters. Intl., Inc. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52267(U) (App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) Defendant demonstrated, through the affirmed peer review
Elmont Open Mri & Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52222(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) I guess
