Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Redland Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50751(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “On appeal, defendant’s sole argument is that it raised
Quality Psychological Servs., P.C. v Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co, 2013 NY Slip Op 50750(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The affidavit further states that, in
Flores v Vescera, 2013 NY Slip Op 02866 (4th Dept. 2013) (1) You cannot videotape the IME (2) You cannot keep the plaintiff attorney out. With respect
City Care Acupuncture, PC v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50430(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “In opposition, plaintiff did not deny
Coast Med. Diagnostic, PC v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50381(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The defendant-insurer made a prima facie showing of entitlement
American Transit v. Rosa [MSJ – Thompson] Part (1): “Active argues that the summary judgment motion should be denied pursuant to CPLR 3212(f) without any indication
Alev Med. Supply, Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50258(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) This was seen once before in
This Court addressed the less than stellar argument that Unitrin was overruled by Mercury v. Encare – which in turn will be overturned through the new
Quality Psychological Servs., P.C. v Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50148(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “We sustain the denial of defendant’s motion for summary
I like this case because the Court here in the Unitrin scenario realized where it went awry and righted a wrong. American Transit Ins. Co. v. Barbara Ramirez,
Brooklyn Hgts. Physical Therapy, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 52406(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) I am lost on this
Unitrin has created this vacuum where the failure to control ones Assignor has spelled unabated doom to many a medical clinic. Imagine having this conversation during
