Couldn't get it right the second time around
Central Radiology Servs., P.C. v MVAIC, 2010 NY Slip Op 50887(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “During oral argument, the Civil Court granted defendant leave to submit
Central Radiology Servs., P.C. v MVAIC, 2010 NY Slip Op 50887(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “During oral argument, the Civil Court granted defendant leave to submit
Central Radiology Servs., P.C. v MVAIC, 2010 NY Slip Op 50887(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “During oral argument, the Civil Court granted defendant leave to submit
In the latest saga involving IME’s, the question arose as to whether an examinee could prosecute a defamation action against the examiner or any other entity
I could definitely see situations where it might be appropriate for an insurance carrier, as part of an IME, to demand that a claimant undergo a
For those who are unsure what satisfies the “personal knowledge” prong of an IME no-show defense, the Appellate Term in uncharacterstic fashion spelled it out: Radiology