Categories
Categories
New York’s No-Fault: The Verification Paradigm. An expert Analysis
The Basics of No-Fault Insurance Under New York’s no-fault insurance system, every registered vehicle owner must carry a minimum of $50,000 in personal injury protection (PIP)
New York’s Judiciary Law Section 470: A Potential Pitfall for Non-Resident Attorneys
New York’s Judiciary Law Section 470 New York Judiciary Law Section 470, a statute originally enacted in 1862, requires that attorneys practicing in New York state
Why Law Firms Should Consider Specialized AI Over General AI
Introduction In recent years, the rise of generative AI systems like ChatGPT and Claude has taken the world by storm. These advanced language models can engage
Is a Dog Sitter Responsible for a Dog Bite in NY
More and more New Yorkers are relying on pet sitters and apps like Rover, Wag, Care, Fetch, PetSitters, and Trusted House Sitters. Unfortunately with the rise
What to Wear to Court ?
Dressing for Success: How Your Courtroom Attire Can Influence Your Case In the world of courtroom dramas and movies, we often see characters dressed impeccably in
First Steps of an Injury Lawsuit?
Initiating an Injury Lawsuit: A Step-by-Step Guide The primary step in initiating an injury lawsuit involves verifying if you possess the legal grounds or standing to
General Ins. v Piquing
General Ins. v Piquion, 2022 NY Slip Op 07500 (1st Dept. 2023) (1) STANDARD ON MOTION TO DISMISS DJ: “On a motion to dismiss a declaratory
Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Metro Pain Specialists P.C
Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Metro Pain Specialists P.C., 2022 NY Slip Op 06865 (1st Dept. 2023) “In response to Country-Wide’s prima facie showing, defendants submitted no
NYCRR 65-3.15
Matter of DTR Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Refill Rx Pharm., Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 00179 (1st Dept. 2023) “Country-Wide was not precluded from raising the
Policy Exhaustion and 3.15
Matter of DTR Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Refill Rx Pharm., Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 00179 (1st Dept. 2023) “Country-Wide was not precluded from raising the
Blog
Latest in Blog
The failure to attend IMEs is now considered a Chubb coverage defense
Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 2011 NY Slip Op 01948 (1st Dept. 2011) I would consider this matter the most precedential
Only in no-fault can a Civil Court JHO "reverse" the holdings of the Appellate Divisions and the Court of Appeals
You can find this case from the January 24, 2010 law journal, reproduced on David Barshay’s No-Fault Paradise. That said, I have three points I
The first pure Unitrin Appellate Term holding
Harmonic Physical Therapy, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51597(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) “In this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault
