Superior Oxygen & Ortho Supplies, Ltd. v Auto One Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50348(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “defendant failed to establish that the
I liked that title, but it is not necessarily true. It is an embellishment at best, and if you clicked on it, then it did the
Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51455(U)(App.Term 2d Dept. 2010) You have seem this before. “Contrary to the Civil
Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51338(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) Part I: “[c]ontrary to the finding of the
Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51334(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “To raise a triable issue of fact based on
St. Vincent Med. Care, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50446(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “While defendant properly argues that an EUO need
The Appellate Term, Second Department seems to be all over the place with the “EUO” cases. The analysis is really needlessly strained and hard to follow.
