In today’s edition of the New York Law Journal, I discuss why the “fee schedule” defense is anything but a defense. The article is entitled: “Is
In today’s edition of the New York Law Journal, I discuss why the “fee schedule” defense is anything but a defense. The article is entitled: “Is
As those of you know, I usually publish an article in the New York Law Journal each spring or summer regarding some thoughts I have about
This was just a thought as I read through the Appellate Term, Second Department, decisions that came out today. I will confess that I was .5
This was just a thought as I read through the Appellate Term, Second Department, decisions that came out today. I will confess that I was .5
I was inspired by DG over at NFP to write something not no-fault related, per se. But then I realized people do not read this blog
It is nice to know that the top bloggers of the no-fault bar have been nominated for LexisNexis’s Top 50 Insurance blogs, as Dave reports to
I came across this trade industry group called “New York Fair”, who seems focused on modifying some of the provisions of the new proposed regulations and
I took this description of me off of Ray Zuppa’s final post on his pit. I am not sure it is true, but I will take
I took this description of me off of Ray Zuppa’s final post on his pit. I am not sure it is true, but I will take
Westchester Med. Ctr. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 30649(u)(Sup. Ct. Nassau Co.) This case involved a non-coverage defense – actually, two of
Grillo v Williamsh, 2010 NY Slip Op 02290 (4th Dept. 2010) The Court denied a motion for summary judgment in a strict-liability dog-bite case. I dislike
