Frias v James, 2010 NY Slip Op 00301 (1st Dept. 2010) “In support of their motion, defendants submitted evidence that plaintiff was suffering from restrictions of
Frias v James, 2010 NY Slip Op 00301 (1st Dept. 2010) “In support of their motion, defendants submitted evidence that plaintiff was suffering from restrictions of
I have always said that to understand no-fault, you need to understand bodily injury law. This is typified through instances where the result of an assigned
Valentin v Pomilla 2009 NY Slip Op 00981 (1st Dept. 2009) “Defendants established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning
Valentin v Pomilla 2009 NY Slip Op 00981 (1st Dept. 2009) “Defendants established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning
First as to yay – an “APPEAL AND OPINION” from the First Department Delfino v Luzon 2009 NY Slip Op 00317 (1st Dept. 2009) The defense
State Farm v. Stack 2008 NY Slip Op 07651 (2d Dept. 2008) “A no-fault arbitration tribunal twice concluded that the defendant, James Stack, was entitled to
