45-day rule – insufficiency of justification
AR Med. Rehabilitation, P.C. v MVAIC, 2010 NY Slip Op 50828(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “It is undisputed that plaintiff was required to submit its claim
AR Med. Rehabilitation, P.C. v MVAIC, 2010 NY Slip Op 50828(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “It is undisputed that plaintiff was required to submit its claim
Prestige Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50449(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “The denial of claim form adequately
Synergy First Med. PLLC v ELRAC Inc, 2010 NY Slip Op 50048(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2009). I missed this case, although it was pretty well discussed
Upon a medical provider’s or Claimant’s violation of the 30-day rule or 45-day rule, and an insurance carrier’s timely denial thereto, what happens if a Plaintiff/Claimant
Bronx Expert Radiology, P.C. v Motor Veh. Acciden Indem. Corp. 2009 NYSlipOp 50621(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2009) “Defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted.