Gorelik v Gorelik, 2010 NY Slip Op 01922 (2d Dept. 2010) “Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court correctly declined to give collateral estoppel effect
Numerous assignments of a debt, sewer service and a lack of respect for a court can spell complete disaster. Read below. Erin Servs. Co., LLC. v
The Appellate Division First Department has on numerous occasions has held that CPLR 3404 applies to Civil Court actions, while the Second Department has found that
Mayard v Wheels, Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 00653 (2d Dept. 2010) “Under these circumstances, where McKenzie was faced with a sudden and unexpected circumstance, not
In another CPLR issue, the Appellate Division affirmed the order of the Supreme Court that allowed a defendant to open an entered default. Rodgers v 66
Lennard v Khan, 2010 NY Slip Op 00482 (2d Dept. 2010) If an untimely MSJ by another party addresses identical issues of a timely moving party’s
In my exploration of cases, I came across this really disturbing case. What can someone do to provoke this type of reaction? People v Stewart, 2009
In my exploration of cases, I came across this really disturbing case. What can someone do to provoke this type of reaction? People v Stewart, 2009
One issue or perhaps concern that exists in no-fault practice is whether a provider needs to submit a HIPPA compliant authorization in order to prosecute an
The Appellate Term, six years ago, analogized an action sounding in no-fault benefits to one for an account stated. An account stated cause of action is
I am sure that those of you who read my blog on a regular or semi-regular basis have figured out who I was by now. Let
I would like to thank Roy Mura at coverage counsel for including this blog in his google search. The irony is that you never really know
