In support of the plaintiff’s [respondent’s] cross motion, she relied upon, inter alia, Dr. Westreich’s affirmation, which was sufficient to meet her prima facie burden
In support of the plaintiff’s [respondent’s] cross motion, she relied upon, inter alia, Dr. Westreich’s affirmation, which was sufficient to meet her prima facie burden
In support of the plaintiff’s [respondent’s] cross motion, she relied upon, inter alia, Dr. Westreich’s affirmation, which was sufficient to meet her prima facie burden
Miller v Bah, 2010 NY Slip Op 04753 (2d Dept. 2010) “After he testified, the plaintiff, who did not identify the defendant in court as