Appellate Term Second Department expounds on sufficient medical rationale in DME case
Park Slope Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50761(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) Is there something about durable medical equipment that brings out
Park Slope Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50761(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) Is there something about durable medical equipment that brings out
Innovative MR Imaging, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50264(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “The unsworn letter report submitted by plaintiff from the assignor’s
All Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50252(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) Prior trial testimony was plainly insufficient to rebut
Pomona Med. Diagnostic P.C. v Adirondack Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 51165(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) Defendant appeared to work under a novel theory that
So many people complain that the Pan Chiro line of cases represent a one-way street on the issue of medical necessity . I remembered a case
New Life Med., P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 51061(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) It was just insufficient. “In support of its cross
Neomy Med., P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50769(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “Since the affidavit by plaintiff’s supervising physician failed to
Complete Radiology, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50419(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “the affirmed letter of medical necessity submitted by plaintiff’s assignor’s
Darlington Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50226(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) Extension of Pan Medical I always said Praetorian mean
I am waiting for Mitch Lustig’s comment about how these courts refuse to learn their lesson… Ortho-Med Surgical Supply, Inc. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2012
Radiology Today, P.C. v Mercury Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50148(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “In opposition to the motion, plaintiff submitted a doctor’s affirmation
Neomy Med., P.C. v Geico Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50145(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “In opposition to defendant’s cross motion, plaintiff submitted an affidavit