Praetorian again
February 17, 2012 1 Comment
Darlington Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50226(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) Extension of Pan Medical I always said Praetorian mean
Darlington Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50226(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) Extension of Pan Medical I always said Praetorian mean
I am waiting for Mitch Lustig’s comment about how these courts refuse to learn their lesson… Ortho-Med Surgical Supply, Inc. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2012
Radiology Today, P.C. v Mercury Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50148(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “In opposition to the motion, plaintiff submitted a doctor’s affirmation
Neomy Med., P.C. v Geico Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50145(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “In opposition to defendant’s cross motion, plaintiff submitted an affidavit
Pomona Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50276(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) “[t]he report of defendant’s peer review doctor, which relied
Park Slope Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50188(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “[p]laintiff submitted an affirmation of its
Elmont Open Mri & Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52222(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) I guess
Elmont Open MRI & Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52061(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) Dynamic Med. Imaging, P.C. v
Richmond Pain Mgt., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52015(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) (my case) Radiology Today, P.C. v Mercury Ins.
The November 10, 2010 decisions from the Appellate Term disclose two (2) Pan Chiropractic v. Mercury citings. High Quality Med., P.C. v Mercury Ins. Co., 2010
I suspect if there is one case that I won that I never thought would be consistently cited, Pan Chiro would be it. Pan Chiro involved
Okay, I am back to my posts regarding what should be necessary to defeat a medical necessity summary judgment motion. This is from a lead paint
“Dr. Thompson also failed to reconcile his findings of limitation in the plaintiff’s left shoulder in May 2009, as set forth in his affirmation, with the
Innovative Chiropractic, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50884(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “Appeal from an order…granting plaintiff’s cross
Quality Psychological Servs., P.C. v Mercury Ins. Group, 2010 NY Slip Op 50601(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff submitted, among other
Another Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact against a medical necessity summary judgment motion. This affidavit, if memory served me correct, was quite
My medical necessity summary judgment crusade continues. Gz Med. & Diagnostic, P.C. v Mercury Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50491(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) We
This is a case that came out, upon which I prevailed. I want you to compare the plaintiff’s affidavit in this case with that found in
I tend to think that the more medical practice summary judgment motion cases you read, the more you see the interplay between no-fault and medical malpractice
A reoccurring problem in no-fault cases pending in Nassau County District Court is that certain judges have routinely found that defense experts, within the confines of
