So many people complain that the Pan Chiro line of cases represent a one-way street on the issue of medical necessity . I remembered a case
Midtown Med. Assoc., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 51071(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “As the affirmed peer review report submitted by
Alfa Med. Supplies v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50934(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) Contrary to plaintiff’s argument on appeal, defendant was not
All Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50137(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) Point I: “The case was tried on
I am waiting for Mitch Lustig’s comment about how these courts refuse to learn their lesson… Ortho-Med Surgical Supply, Inc. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2012
Diagnostic Medicine, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50102(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) What happened to Pomona v. Geico? Why did A-minus
Total Equip., LLC v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50078(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012 [9th and 10th Jud. Dis]) The 9th and 10th again
PSW Chiropractic Care, P.C. v Maryland Cas. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51719(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In the present case, the record supports the determination
Triangle R Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51663(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) “In this action by plaintiff to
MSSA Corp. v Redland Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51606(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011). A case more remarkable for Justice Steinhardt’s dissent: “In the instant
Neomy Med., P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51532(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In support of its cross motion for summary judgment, defendant
Prospect Medical, PC v. PLIGA, 2011 WL 2462643 (NJAD 2011) “Prospect Medical submitted claims for $18,168.68 for three MUAs performed on July 8, 9, and 10,
