Park Slope Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50761(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) Is there something about durable medical equipment that brings out
A-Quality Med. Supply v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 23088 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The Insurance Department Regulations require merely that a “copy”
Mitrovic v Silverman, 2013 NY Slip Op 01465 (1st Dept. 2013) “While an expert affidavit cannot be speculative, there is no threshold requirement in an ordinary case,
Pomona Med. Diagnostic P.C. v Adirondack Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 51165(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) Defendant appeared to work under a novel theory that
So many people complain that the Pan Chiro line of cases represent a one-way street on the issue of medical necessity . I remembered a case
Midtown Med. Assoc., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 51071(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “As the affirmed peer review report submitted by
Alfa Med. Supplies v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50934(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) Contrary to plaintiff’s argument on appeal, defendant was not
All Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50137(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) Point I: “The case was tried on
I am waiting for Mitch Lustig’s comment about how these courts refuse to learn their lesson… Ortho-Med Surgical Supply, Inc. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2012
Diagnostic Medicine, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50102(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) What happened to Pomona v. Geico? Why did A-minus
Total Equip., LLC v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50078(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012 [9th and 10th Jud. Dis]) The 9th and 10th again
PSW Chiropractic Care, P.C. v Maryland Cas. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51719(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In the present case, the record supports the determination
Triangle R Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51663(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) “In this action by plaintiff to
MSSA Corp. v Redland Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51606(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011). A case more remarkable for Justice Steinhardt’s dissent: “In the instant
Neomy Med., P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51532(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “In support of its cross motion for summary judgment, defendant
Prospect Medical, PC v. PLIGA, 2011 WL 2462643 (NJAD 2011) “Prospect Medical submitted claims for $18,168.68 for three MUAs performed on July 8, 9, and 10,
New York and Presbyterian Hosp. v. Selective Ins. Co. of America, 43 A.D.3d 1019 (2d Dept. 2007) Affidavit insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact
Devonshire Surgical Facility, Carnegie Hill Orthopedic Servs., P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50513(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 20110 “Even assuming that defendant
Consolidated Imaging P.C. (Rafailova) v Travelers Indem. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50159(U)(Civ Ct. Richmond Co. 2011) I did not miss this case. I just avoid
Mahmood v Vicks, 2011 NY Slip Op 00653 (2d Dept. 2011) Call this one: why an MRI performed more than 6 weeks after the MVA is
