EUO objections *may* be futile
December 23, 2014 No Comments
Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51798(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “On appeal, plaintiff contends that the EUO scheduling letters were
Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51798(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “On appeal, plaintiff contends that the EUO scheduling letters were
Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51310(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) I often feel like this Plaintiff attorney
Interboro Ins. Co. v Clennon, 2014 NY Slip Op 00092 (2d Dept. 2014) While of course I am happy to have won, and, in addition, I
Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52005(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Defendant denied the claim at issue based
Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51880(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “On appeal, plaintiff argues that defendant failed to
Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v Nationwide Ins., 2013 NY Slip Op 51746(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Defendant demonstrated that, on November 19, 2009, prior to
Praetorian v. Mercado, Index #: 303993/12 (Sup. Ct. Bx. Co. 2013) In this declaratory judgment action, an Alrof argument was made; an electronic signature argument was
American Transit v. Chedister , Index #: 301921/12 (Sup. Ct. Bronx Co. 2013) Supreme Court could not be anymore emphatic that it is not impressed with the
Mr. Five Boro took at dive in the IME no-show DJ matter of American Transit Ins. Co. v. Beltre, under Bronx Co. Index #: 310468/11 (Sup.
Leica Supply, Inc. v Encompass Indem. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50890(U)(App. Term 2nd Dept. 2012) Plaintiff’s argument that its assignor’s failure to appear for the
Bath Ortho Supply, Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50271(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) The defendant insurer made a
I liked that title, but it is not necessarily true. It is an embellishment at best, and if you clicked on it, then it did the
East Coast Acupuncture, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51229(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “With respect to the unpaid portions of the
GLM Med., P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50194(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) In an affront to those who have
Dynamic Med. Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20285 (Dis. Nassau 2010) I am somewhat flabbergasted at this decision.
There has been a lot of activity on the Supreme Court front, in the realm of declaratory judgment actions, as to whether a insurance carrier must
The Appellate Term, Second Department seems to be all over the place with the “EUO” cases. The analysis is really needlessly strained and hard to follow.
