Dookhie v Woo, 2020 NY Slip Op 00975 (1st Dept. 2020) “A party’s submission of new evidence or argument in reply on the underlying motion constitutes
Budoff v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 05817 (2d Dept. 2018) “As the Supreme Court reviewed the merits of the plaintiff’s contentions raised in
Provek Plus, Inc. v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50870(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “While a court has discretion to entertain renewal based on
One to One v. State Farm, Index #: 79955/10 (Civ. Ct. Bronx Co. 2013)(Gonzalez, JSC) In the normal and ordinary course of business in no-fault Special Term,
DeMarquez v Gallo, 2012 NY Slip Op 03130 (2d Dept. 2012) How many times have you seen this? “[p]laintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the
Schwelnus v Urological Assoc. of L.I., P.C., 2012 NY Slip Op 02858 (2d Dept. 2012) The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’
Abrams v Berelson, 2012 NY Slip Op 02618 (2d Dept. 2012) Plaintiff attempted to renew a lost motion for summary judgment in a premises liability case,
Ashraf Ashour Physical Therapy, P.C. v Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50491(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) Defendant appeals from an order of
Tangalin v MTA Long Is. Bus, 2012 NY Slip Op 01239 (2d Dept. 2012) “We agree with the appellants’ contention that the Supreme Court erroneously treated
Ferrara v De Ming Song, 2010 NY Slip Op 51472(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “[t]he affirmed reports of plaintiff’s medical provider in Florida, submitted in opposition
It is rare to see a 5102(d) case, which has broad implications in various areas of law, find a probable trip to the Court of Appeals.
Here is an interesting case that came from the Appellate Division, Second Department today. It comes to us as a nasty legal malpractice, matrimonial and fraud
