The first department is out of control
Yes, you read that title correctly. Three bizarre decisions as of late, one which deals tangentially with no fault (Garcia v Leon, 2010 NY Slip Op
Yes, you read that title correctly. Three bizarre decisions as of late, one which deals tangentially with no fault (Garcia v Leon, 2010 NY Slip Op
Grochowski v Fudella, 2010 NY Slip Op 01210 (4th Dept. 2010) The world of summary jury trials. Similar to many of the framed issue no-fault trials
Here is an interesting case that came from the Appellate Division, Second Department today. It comes to us as a nasty legal malpractice, matrimonial and fraud
B.Y., M.D., P.C. v Government Empl. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20026 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This case is weird. Why would a provider
St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 00668 (2d Dept. 2010) “In support of its cross motion, the defendant
In a tribute to the CPLR blog, and DG’s CPLR R. 3212(f) quest, vendetta or obsession (you pick the appropriate one), here is another case where
“Motion granted and complaint dismissed on the condition that defendant, within 60 days of service upon it of a copy of this order with notice of
“Motion granted and complaint dismissed on the condition that defendant, within 60 days of service upon it of a copy of this order with notice of
Globe Med. Care O.L.P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50020(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2010) “Civil Court erred in dismissing this action by plaintiff
Betz v Daniel Conti, Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 00086 (2d Dept. 2010) “Although the affidavit of the defendants’ expert, which was notarized outside the state,
What happens is that once a month, the Fourth Department will slam the Most Recent Decision website with about 100 cases. As a practitioner, blogger and
The Courts seem to be all over the place with the certificate of conformity requirement for out of state affidavits found in CPLR 2309. This statute