Lynn Carter
December 26, 2017 2 Comments
Brand Med. Supply, Inc. v ELRAC, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 51723(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) This all came about at the famous trial in front of
Brand Med. Supply, Inc. v ELRAC, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 51723(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) This all came about at the famous trial in front of
Optimal Well-Being Chiropractic, P.c. v Ameriprise Auto & Home Ins., 2014 NY Slip Op 51858(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Defendant opposed plaintiff’s motion and sought summary judgment
I am not sure what to make of these two decisions. Read them yourself. I think Alrof is wrong. The Appellate Division in Lucas rejected it
Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51310(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) I often feel like this Plaintiff attorney
American States Ins. Co. v Huff, 2014 NY Slip Op 05366 (1st Dept. 2014) (1) “[p]laintiff’s motion for summary judgment as sought a declaration that plaintiff properly
SP Chiropractic, P.C. v IDS Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50952(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) Because defendant failed to submit proof by
Putting aside certain disdain towards the Second Department punting the “absolute coverage” component of Unitrin and ATIC v. Lucas, the IDS case said that when carrier
Muhammad Tahir, M.D., P.C. v Hertz Claims Mgt.,2014 NY Slip Op 50625(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “The Civil Court denied defendant’s motion.” “Because defendant failed to
Active Chiropractic, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50634(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) Standard EUO no-show motion. However, the issue (among others) involved the
Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50134(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, the affidavits submitted
Interboro Ins. Co. v Clennon, 2014 NY Slip Op 00092 (2d Dept. 2014) While of course I am happy to have won, and, in addition, I
Concourse Chiropractic, PLLC v State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52225(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “[w]e find that the affidavits submitted by defendant
Ortho Prods. & Equip., Inc. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52054(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “It further established that its EUO scheduling letters
Olmeur Med., P.C. v Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52031(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant
Arco Med. NY, P.C. v Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52001(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) Court found that an investigator’s affidavit and statements
Praetorian v. Mercado, Index #: 303993/12 (Sup. Ct. Bx. Co. 2013) In this declaratory judgment action, an Alrof argument was made; an electronic signature argument was
Bright Med. Supply Co. v IDS Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51123(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Because defendant failed to submit proof
American Transit v. Chedister , Index #: 301921/12 (Sup. Ct. Bronx Co. 2013) Supreme Court could not be anymore emphatic that it is not impressed with the
Alrof, Inc. v Safeco Natl. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50458(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In support of its cross motion, defendant submitted an affirmation from
Unitrin has created this vacuum where the failure to control ones Assignor has spelled unabated doom to many a medical clinic. Imagine having this conversation during
