Competing Assignees?
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, vs LESS INSTITUTE PHYSICIANS, D/B/A LESSPINE INSTITUTE, A/A/O AMELIA F. STRINGER-GOWD, No. 3D21-157 (Fla 3d DCA 2022) We once heard of a
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, vs LESS INSTITUTE PHYSICIANS, D/B/A LESSPINE INSTITUTE, A/A/O AMELIA F. STRINGER-GOWD, No. 3D21-157 (Fla 3d DCA 2022) We once heard of a
The pre-suit demands. When the State of Florida engages in “lawsuit reform”, the pre-suit demand requirement enters the equation. We saw in 2020 and 2021 with
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY vs CHRISTOS MIKROGIANNAKIS, Case No. 5D21-720 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022) Again, as Florida moved all appeals to their mid level courts from
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. VS. HARRIS C. LEGOME, ET AL. A-1886-20 (1) On June 11, 2013, Allstate filed a complaint against defendants alleging
If I were to use this blog for advertising purposes, I would recommend consulting with me if you receive a PIP trial de novo. It is
Burke Physical Therapy, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 50623(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022) “While defendant’s claims specialist stated that
JPC Med., P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 50562(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022) “To obtain summary judgment on its asserted
Parisien v Ameriprise Auto & Home, 2022 NY Slip Op 50581(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022) “Plaintiff also argues that the affirmations submitted by defendant to demonstrate
Mind & Body Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 50603(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022) “In support of its motion,
New Millennium Med. Imaging, P.C. v 21st Century Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 50605(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022) “In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff demonstrated
Clear Water Psychological Servs., P.C. v Mid-Century Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 50621(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022) In its motion, defendant set forth three scheduled
Parisien v Travelers Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 50622(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022) “Contrary to plaintiff’s sole contention with respect to defendant’s motion, plaintiff’s letters,