Blog

I always joke around with my plaintiff friends that should you sue my clients, I will be the first person on the ECF system to file

People v Grennon (Scott), 2011 NY Slip Op 21265 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) In this case, Defendant beat a 0.19% reading and convinced the Appellate

Interestingly, I made the New York Post – but not for my work in PIP or in maintaining this blog.  I would note that the research

Ap Orthopedic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v MVAIC,  2011 NY Slip Op 51448(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) Another MVAIC case from the App. Term, Second.  I have

Pomona Med. Diagnostics v GEICO Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 78799(U)(1st Dept. 2011) Leave denied. I reviewed the record.  It was not the right case

Somebody – namely me – served a notice of appeal on the wrong attorney, yet timely filed the said notice of appeal.  CPLR 5520(a) to the

People v Thomas (William), 2011 NY Slip Op 51338(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2011) “Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of

Ave T MPC Corp. v Auto One Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51292(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “A no-fault provider establishes its prima facie entitlement

I just appeared in District Nassau, and I was just reminded that there actually is a degree of professionalism left in no-fault practice.  You actually feel

Comprehensive Health Center, Inc. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 56 So.3d 41 (Fl. Cir. Ct. 2011) Both sides agree that Telusnor did not appear for the

So you rear-end somebody in an MVA.  Many of us have done it or will do it.  Consider it the law of averages.  You now are

I promised when more brain cells became active, I would respond to Sun’s post from last week on the main blog.  Here is the post with

Sometimes, I forget how surreal this practice is.  I was in Civil Court today – those who saw me know which one.  I argued an acupuncture

I apologize for not being too on the ball over the last few days with the posts.  I have been involved in this crazy Yellowstone case

People v Agostini, 2011 NY Slip Op 03752 (4th Dept. 2011) Great line from the Fourth Department “[d]efendant contends that he was denied a fair trial

Update on this one – Remand in Family Court today.  Using my no-fault interest calculator, which I converted to normal use for my deep calculations, this

IME no-show and EUO no-show cases.  A Civil court sitting in the Second Department followed Unitirn v. Bayshore, and justified its application better than the First

Keeping in my quest – aside from some of the amusing, interesting yet irrelevant comments that find their way on here – to try to keep

Malpeli v Yenna, 2011 NY Slip Op 00654 (2d Dept. 2011) This is a wacky case to say the least.  The facts as can be discerned

A-Quality Med. Supply v Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20502 (Civ. Kings 2010) So let me get this straight.  The failure to produce