Hunt City Chiropractic, LLP v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51679(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “We agree that the conflicting medical expert opinions
Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v GEICO Ins., 2013 NY Slip Op 23283 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (A) The insufficient rebuttal “In support of the branch of
Amato v. State Farm Ins. Co., 30 Misc.3d 238 (Dis. Ct. Nassau Co. 2010), rev’d by Amato v State Farm Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51113(U)(App. Term
Synergy Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51047(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “Notably, defendant’s peer reviewer explained in some detail that the manipulation
Brand v Evangelista, 103 AD3d 539 (1st Dept. 2013) “[d]efendant’s physicians required to review plaintiff’s medical records, since they detailed the specific tests they used in their
Brooklyn Chiropractic & Sports Therapy, P.C. v A. Cent. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50904(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (1) “Defendant also submitted an affirmed
Radiology Today, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50849(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Since defendant’s expert’s testimony did not include a factual basis
Park Slope Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50761(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) Is there something about durable medical equipment that brings out
Utica Acupuncture, P.C. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50643(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “In opposition to the defendant-insurer’s prima facie showing of entitlement to
Amherst Med. Supply, LLC v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50586(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “The peer review report and
A-Quality Med. Supply v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 23088 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The Insurance Department Regulations require merely that a “copy”
Mitrovic v Silverman, 2013 NY Slip Op 01465 (1st Dept. 2013) “While an expert affidavit cannot be speculative, there is no threshold requirement in an ordinary case,
