Webster Ave Med. Pavilion, PC v Allstate Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50393(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2014) “The trial court was entitled to reject the sparse
Martin Plutno v Travelers Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50412(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) (1) Simple fee schedule arithmetic may be performed by “defendant’s employee”:
Hillside Open MRI, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50408(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) (1) “In this action by a provider to recover assigned
Alev Med. Supply, Inc. v Government Employees Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50130(U) “Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, the Civil Court properly overruled plaintiff’s hearsay objection to
Perez v Fitzgerald, 2014 NY Slip Op 00744 (1st Dept. 2014) This is a chiropractor malpractice case and the Appellate Division held that the 3 year and
Metropolitan Diagnostic Med. Care, P.C. v A. Cent. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52246(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In opposition to defendant’s motion, and in
Total Equip., LLC v Mercury Cas. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52220(U)(App. Term 2d Dept 2013) “In support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant submitted, among
Drew De Marco, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52212(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “[d]uring Dr. Portnoy’s redirect testimony, the trial court precluded
Hercules Med., PC v Cabello, 2013 NY Slip Op 52186(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court’s determination that
Amherst Med. Supply, LLC v A. Cent. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51800(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “The peer review report and accompanying affidavit submitted
Premier Health Choice Chiropractic, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51802(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “sworn independent medical examination (IME) report of its
AP Diagnostic Med., PC v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51647(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “The medical affidavit submitted by plaintiff – which
Hunt City Chiropractic, LLP v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51679(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “We agree that the conflicting medical expert opinions
Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v GEICO Ins., 2013 NY Slip Op 23283 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (A) The insufficient rebuttal “In support of the branch of
Amato v. State Farm Ins. Co., 30 Misc.3d 238 (Dis. Ct. Nassau Co. 2010), rev’d by Amato v State Farm Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51113(U)(App. Term
Synergy Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51047(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “Notably, defendant’s peer reviewer explained in some detail that the manipulation
Brand v Evangelista, 103 AD3d 539 (1st Dept. 2013) “[d]efendant’s physicians required to review plaintiff’s medical records, since they detailed the specific tests they used in their
Brooklyn Chiropractic & Sports Therapy, P.C. v A. Cent. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50904(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (1) “Defendant also submitted an affirmed
Radiology Today, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50849(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Since defendant’s expert’s testimony did not include a factual basis
Park Slope Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50761(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) Is there something about durable medical equipment that brings out
