Medical necessity not sustained
Rosenzweig v Mercury Cas. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50324(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “In support of its motion, defendant submitted a sworn peer review report which
Rosenzweig v Mercury Cas. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50324(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “In support of its motion, defendant submitted a sworn peer review report which
Arnica Acupuncture PC v Interboro Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 01434 (1st Dept. 2016) This was my second foray at the Appellate Division (this time as
Pugsley Chiropractic PLLC v Merchants Preferred Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50167(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2016) (1) “The report erroneously identified Dr. Perrie as a licensed
Bongiovanni v Cavagnuolo, 2016 NY Slip Op 00638 (2d Dept. 2016) If we are going to work off the assumption that lack of medical necessity in the
AutoOne Ins./Gen. Assur. v Eastern Is. Med. Care, P.C., 2016 NY Slip Op 00916 (2d Dept. 2016) The reason I appealed “Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination,
Dayan v Allstate Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51751(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) At issue in this case is which party bears the burden of proving
Throgs Neck Multicare, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51756(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) The rebuttal affidavit was pretty poor. Yet,
Ap Orthopedic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51656(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial,
Healing Art Acupuncture, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51670(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “While the court has the power to award summary judgment
SAL Med., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51449(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “The defect in one of the peer review reports submitted
Innovative MR Imaging, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51402(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2015) “In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff submitted two letters of
IDF Diagnostic Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51213(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “The Civil Court held that, since