An IME no show case
May 16, 2013 1 Comment
Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Redland Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50751(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “On appeal, defendant’s sole argument is that it raised
Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Redland Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50751(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “On appeal, defendant’s sole argument is that it raised
Quality Psychological Servs., P.C. v Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co, 2013 NY Slip Op 50750(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The affidavit further states that, in
Flores v Vescera, 2013 NY Slip Op 02866 (4th Dept. 2013) (1) You cannot videotape the IME (2) You cannot keep the plaintiff attorney out. With respect
City Care Acupuncture, PC v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50430(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “In opposition, plaintiff did not deny
Coast Med. Diagnostic, PC v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50381(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The defendant-insurer made a prima facie showing of entitlement
American Transit v. Rosa [MSJ – Thompson] Part (1): “Active argues that the summary judgment motion should be denied pursuant to CPLR 3212(f) without any indication
Alev Med. Supply, Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50258(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) This was seen once before in
This Court addressed the less than stellar argument that Unitrin was overruled by Mercury v. Encare – which in turn will be overturned through the new
Quality Psychological Servs., P.C. v Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50148(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “We sustain the denial of defendant’s motion for summary
I like this case because the Court here in the Unitrin scenario realized where it went awry and righted a wrong. American Transit Ins. Co. v. Barbara Ramirez,
Brooklyn Hgts. Physical Therapy, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 52406(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) I am lost on this
Unitrin has created this vacuum where the failure to control ones Assignor has spelled unabated doom to many a medical clinic. Imagine having this conversation during
New York Methodist v. Country Wide, Sup Ct. Nassau Co. Index #: 3676/11 Nassau has been all over the place on the DJ front regarding the
VE Med. Care, P.C. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 51074(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) (1) Letters were mailed; (2) The
Concourse Chiropractic, PLLC v Fiduciary Ins. Co. of Am., 2012 NY Slip Op 51058(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) This is the first case where the Court
BR Clinton Chiropractic, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50880(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012). An affidavit executed by defendant’s
Continental Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50844(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2012) “The defendant-insurer made a prima facie
Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50579(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “Defendant also submitted an affirmation
East 75th St. Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 35 Misc.3d 126(A) 1) “The affidavit sufficiently established that the IME notices
As I indicated at one point prior, there is an issue as to whether NYP v. Countrywide has aligned the Court of Appeals with Unitrin v.
