Fraudulent procurement defense precluded
NY court rules insurer failed to establish timely denial defense for fraudulent procurement claim, highlighting ongoing debates in no-fault insurance law.
Read More →Fraud
8 articles by Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
Triangle R again
Court rejects insurer's attempt to pursue fraud depositions without properly preserving defenses, highlighting importance of timely claim denials in no-fault cases.
Read More →
A citing of the Anti-Fair Price regulation
Court analysis of Anti-Fair Price regulation's impact on no-fault insurance defenses and preclusion rules in New York personal injury cases.
Read More →
Fraudulent procurement and preclusuion
New York no-fault insurance law addresses when carriers can raise fraudulent procurement defenses and timing requirements under the 30-day pay or deny rule.
Read More →
Partial fraud?
Court rules that billing for one undelivered item doesn't void entire no-fault policy, allowing recovery for other legitimately provided medical supplies.
Read More →
No-Fault Insurance Fraud Recovery: Understanding the 30-Day Payment Rule in NY
Learn about NY's 30-day payment rule for no-fault fraud recovery. Expert analysis of Lincoln v Alev Medical Supply and its impact on Long Island & NYC personal injury cases. Call (516) 750-0595.
Read More →
Counterclaim based upon precludable fraud rebuffed
New York court rejects GEICO's fraud counterclaim in no-fault case, ruling claims precluded due to untimely denial of benefits on fraud grounds.
Read More →
What is the starkest difference between no-fault and domestic relations law?
Learn how NY courts use equitable powers to combat elder abuse in domestic relations cases. Expert analysis of Campbell v Thomas and protection strategies. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →