Preclusion of bio-mechanical opinion
Dovberg v Laubach case analysis: Second Department precludes biomechanical expert testimony lacking proper foundation in peer-reviewed literature and empirical data.
Read More →Expert journals and treatises
7 articles by Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
The expert
New York court ruling in Kohler v Barker explores the boundaries of expert witness testimony and how far attorneys can push expert opinions in personal injury cases.
Read More →
A Frye hearing is required where two sides have opposing literature on a contested novel service
Frye hearing required when experts present conflicting literature on novel medical theories. Court analysis of prenatal neuroblastoma detection standards.
Read More →
The Critical Role of Medical Literature in Expert Testimony
Expert analysis of Rowe v Fisher on medical literature requirements for expert testimony. Personal injury case insights for Long Island and NYC. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
An interesting discovery case involving the right to obtain alcohol treatment records
Expert analysis of medical records discovery rights in NY personal injury cases. L.T. v Teva Pharms case study. Call (516) 750-0595 for consultation.
Read More →
Expert Competency and Medical Literature in New York Medical Malpractice and No-Fault Cases
New York court guidance on expert competency and medical literature use in medical malpractice and no-fault cases. Essential reading for Long Island attorneys.
Read More →
Expert Testimony and Medical Journals: Navigating New York Courts
Understanding expert testimony rules for medical journals and treatises in New York courts. Legal analysis for personal injury and medical malpractice cases. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →