Active Imaging, P.C. v Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co, 2010 NY Slip Op 51842(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) The Appellate Term, Second Department rejected a plaintiff’s challenge
Carothers v GEICO Indem. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51718(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010). We just saw this from the Fourth Department this week. Compare –
Matter of State of New York v Wilkes, 2010 NY Slip Op 07006 (4th Dept. 2010) “Insofar as respondent preserved for our review his further contention
Matter of State of New York v Wilkes, 2010 NY Slip Op 07006 (4th Dept. 2010) “Insofar as respondent preserved for our review his further contention
Velocity Invs., LLC v Cocina, 2010 NY Slip Op 06854 (4th Dept. 2010) “We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion inasmuch
People v Batjer, 2010 NY Slip Op 06825 (4th Dept. 2010) “We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain records
Total Family Chiropractic v Mercury Cas. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51470(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This was another one that did not necessarily go my
This was a comment from Jerry Maline, of Richard Lau’s office, State Farm’s in-house counsel. This is a really astute comment, and got me thinking for
This was a comment from Jerry Maline, of Richard Lau’s office, State Farm’s in-house counsel. This is a really astute comment, and got me thinking for
Okay, I am back to my posts regarding what should be necessary to defeat a medical necessity summary judgment motion. This is from a lead paint
Quality Health Prods., Inc. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50990(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “Plaintiff argues, among other things, that
Urban Radiology, P.C. v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50987(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This case really should be in the misc.3d reporter
