Attacking an expert based upon his religion leads to reversal
April 6, 2011 11 Comments
Matter of State of New York v Andrew O., 2011 NY Slip Op 02715 (2011) This from the Court of Appeals. In a Mental Health Law
Matter of State of New York v Andrew O., 2011 NY Slip Op 02715 (2011) This from the Court of Appeals. In a Mental Health Law
Rowe v Fisher, 2011 NY Slip Op 01721 (1st Dept. 2011) “The motion court properly precluded plaintiffs’ expert testimony on chelation because the expert’s theories were
Consolidated Imaging P.C. (Rafailova) v Travelers Indem. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50159(U)(Civ Ct. Richmond Co. 2011) I did not miss this case. I just avoid
Rodriguez v New York City Tr. Auth., 2011 NY Slip Op 01258 (2d Dept. 2011) “We agree with the defendant that the Supreme Court erred in
Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 21039 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) When Carothers was decided, people on here
Yellow Book of N.Y., L.P. v Cataldo, 2011 NY Slip Op 00678 (2d Dept. 2011): Affiant could work for successor entity and lay a proper business
Matter of State of New York v Motzer, 2010 NY Slip Op 09688 (4th Dept. 2010) “Respondent contends that the court erred in allowing petitioner’s expert
Applewhite v Accuhealth, Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 09570 (1st Dept. 2010) In a decision that produced a three judge majority and a two judge concurrence
Elmont Open Mri & Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52222(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) I guess
Short and sweet from the Appellate Division. J.D.M. Imports Co., Inc. v Hartstein, 2010 NY Slip Op 09186 (1st Dept. 2010) “The court correctly found that
Smolinski v Smolinski, 2010 NY Slip Op 08468 (4th Dept. 2010) I admit that I failed to pick up this case on my own. A nice
Balcom v Reither, 2010 NY Slip Op 07701 (2d Dept. 2010) “The plaintiffs contend that the Supreme Court erred in granting those branches of the defendants’
Active Imaging, P.C. v Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co, 2010 NY Slip Op 51842(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) The Appellate Term, Second Department rejected a plaintiff’s challenge
Carothers v GEICO Indem. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51718(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010). We just saw this from the Fourth Department this week. Compare –
Matter of State of New York v Wilkes, 2010 NY Slip Op 07006 (4th Dept. 2010) “Insofar as respondent preserved for our review his further contention
Velocity Invs., LLC v Cocina, 2010 NY Slip Op 06854 (4th Dept. 2010) “We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion inasmuch
People v Batjer, 2010 NY Slip Op 06825 (4th Dept. 2010) “We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain records
Total Family Chiropractic v Mercury Cas. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51470(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This was another one that did not necessarily go my
This was a comment from Jerry Maline, of Richard Lau’s office, State Farm’s in-house counsel. This is a really astute comment, and got me thinking for
Okay, I am back to my posts regarding what should be necessary to defeat a medical necessity summary judgment motion. This is from a lead paint
