EBT in aid of arbitration? No dice.
May 7, 2010 No Comments
Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 2010 NY Slip Op 03944 (2d Dept. 2010) “The test for ordering disclosure to aid in
Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 2010 NY Slip Op 03944 (2d Dept. 2010) “The test for ordering disclosure to aid in
A.B. Med. Servs., PLLC v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50702(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “Plaintiffs’ prior action was dismissed
Bernal v Singh, 2010 NY Slip Op 03053 (2d Dept. 2010) “It is settled that the nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed pursuant
Seda v Epstein, 2010 NY Slip Op 02850 (1st Dept. 2010) “There is no evidence that defendants’ removal of the debris was willful; indeed, the preliminary
Once a month, the Fourth Department usually barrages us with about 100 or so decisions. The hard part is sifting through them quickly enough and finding
Bath Med. Supply, Inc. v Allstate Indem. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20059 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) First, the Appellate Term, Second Department, appears to
Rodriguez v United Bronx Parents, Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 01366 (1st Dept. 2010): “Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered August 26,
Ikeda v Tedesco, 2010 NY Slip Op 01283 (4th Dept. 2010) “We reject plaintiff’s contention that, pursuant to CPLR 3402, a party may file a note
I am going to copy and paste what I think is the pertinent portion of the decision in Thompson v Mather, 2010 NY Slip Op 01239
We see here an interesting case where a defendant is forced to undergo a somewhat invasive test. The Court was steadfast in its holding in Welter
Mia Acupuncture, P.C. v Mercury Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 29509 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) In this case and the other joined cases, the
The Appellate Division examined the provision of the CPLR deposition venue statute as it applies to parties who would be significantly inconvenienced in coming to a
Stoian v. Reed, 2009 NY Slip Op 07713 (3d Dept. 2009) “We also reject plaintiffs’ assertion that Supreme Court abused its discretion in failing to grant
Northfield Ins. Co. v Model Towing & Recovery 2009 NY Slip Op 04878 (2d Dept 2009). While this case represents nothing unique, the path the Appellate
Queens Chiropractic Mgt., P.C. v Country Wide Ins. Co. 2009 NY Slip Op 51073(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009). In yet another defeat to the Plaintiff’s bar
A.M. Med. Servs., P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co. 2009 NY Slip Op 51029(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) Simply put, you have to read this case. It
It has been a real quiet few months in our world of law. Nothing too substantial has come out recently. There have been some procedural cases,
