Dismissal for failure to comply with one discovery order
Renelique v Lancer Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51596(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) By order entered March 31, 2014, the Civil Court granted defendant’s unopposed
Renelique v Lancer Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51596(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) By order entered March 31, 2014, the Civil Court granted defendant’s unopposed
Fox v Grand Slam Banquet Hall, 2016 NY Slip Op 05897 (1st Dept. 2016) (1) “Under the particular circumstances of this case, the court abused its discretion
Cps 227 LLC v Brody, 2016 NY Slip Op 00446 (1st Dept. 2016) “Supreme Court properly struck defendant’s answer based on its finding that he failed to
Conway v Elite Towing & Flatbedding Corp. 2016 NY Slip Op 00470 (2d Dept. 2016) Generally in personal injury and no-fault litigation, the report of the exert
Huntington Regional Chiropractic, P.C. v Mercury Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51900(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “With respect to the branch of defendant’s motion seeking
(Editor note: original post said “now” allowed. I meant “not” allowed) It always seemed common sense that a substitute IME doctor would not be allowed. This
Duke Acupuncture, P.C. v Mercury Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51701(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “Defendant sufficiently established the timely mailing (see St. Vincent’s Hosp. of
Metro Health Prods., Inc. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51451(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “On March 19, 2012, after plaintiff failed
IDF Diagnostic Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51213(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “The Civil Court held that, since
Acupuncture Solutions, P.C. v Lumbermans Mut. Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51084(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) At the end of the day, the insurance carrier
Medical Arts Radiological Group, P.C. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51035(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “Thus, when defendant moved for
Seck v Serrano, 2015 NY Slip Op 00596 (1st Dept. 2015) “We note that the order was not a conditional, “self-executing” order, which required discovery to be