Hello Mrs. Collins
May 19, 2017 No Comments
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v RLC Med., P.C., 2017 NY Slip Op 03979 (2d Dept. 2017) (1) “The plaintiff insurance company commenced this action against,
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v RLC Med., P.C., 2017 NY Slip Op 03979 (2d Dept. 2017) (1) “The plaintiff insurance company commenced this action against,
Suarez v Shapiro Family Realty Assoc., LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 02914 (1) “Under the circumstances, where plaintiff’s certificate of readiness contained no incorrect material representations, the
Cuprill v Citywide Towing & Auto Repair Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 02729 (1st Dept. 2017) It is such a murky area – when is post note
Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50340(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2017) “We find no abuse of discretion in
Renelique v Lancer Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 51596(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) By order entered March 31, 2014, the Civil Court granted defendant’s unopposed
Fox v Grand Slam Banquet Hall, 2016 NY Slip Op 05897 (1st Dept. 2016) (1) “Under the particular circumstances of this case, the court abused its discretion
Cps 227 LLC v Brody, 2016 NY Slip Op 00446 (1st Dept. 2016) “Supreme Court properly struck defendant’s answer based on its finding that he failed to
Conway v Elite Towing & Flatbedding Corp. 2016 NY Slip Op 00470 (2d Dept. 2016) Generally in personal injury and no-fault litigation, the report of the exert
Huntington Regional Chiropractic, P.C. v Mercury Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51900(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “With respect to the branch of defendant’s motion seeking
(Editor note: original post said “now” allowed. I meant “not” allowed) It always seemed common sense that a substitute IME doctor would not be allowed. This
Duke Acupuncture, P.C. v Mercury Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51701(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “Defendant sufficiently established the timely mailing (see St. Vincent’s Hosp. of
Metro Health Prods., Inc. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51451(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “On March 19, 2012, after plaintiff failed
IDF Diagnostic Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51213(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “The Civil Court held that, since
Acupuncture Solutions, P.C. v Lumbermans Mut. Cas. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51084(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) At the end of the day, the insurance carrier
Medical Arts Radiological Group, P.C. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51035(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “Thus, when defendant moved for
Seck v Serrano, 2015 NY Slip Op 00596 (1st Dept. 2015) “We note that the order was not a conditional, “self-executing” order, which required discovery to be
Optimal Well-Being Chiropractic, P.C. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51807(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Defendant’s only argument on appeal with respect to its
Cason v Smith, 2014 NY Slip Op 06412 (4th Dept. 2014) This is an interesting discovery case. The first principle is that once the employee leaves the
Jamhil Med., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51028(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Defendant subsequently moved to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3126,
All Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50870(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) Remember the stipulation where the releasee agreed that
