There have been numerous cases where the Appellate Term, Second Department, has refused to grant an insurance carrier summary judgment based upon proof that a motor
In another case involving the defense of lack of contact with a pedestrian, the Appellate Term in Midwood Med. Equip. & Supply, Inc. v USAA Cas.
State Farm Ins. Co., v. Frias, 2009 NY Slip Op 07825 (2d Dept. 2009) Dave Gottlieb at No-Fault Paradise posted on this case, and offered his
Alexander Alperovich, M.D., P.C. v Auto One Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 51721(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) They say many times that the devil is
AA Acupuncture Serv., P.C. v Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 2009 NY Slip Op 29311 (App. Term 1st Dept. 2009) This was a really interesting decision.
Mid Atl. Med., P.C. v Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co. 2009 NY Slip Op 50736(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) One of the biggest problems medical providers dealing
I have always said that to understand no-fault, you need to understand bodily injury law. This is typified through instances where the result of an assigned
Valentin v Pomilla 2009 NY Slip Op 00981 (1st Dept. 2009) “Defendants established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning
First as to yay – an “APPEAL AND OPINION” from the First Department Delfino v Luzon 2009 NY Slip Op 00317 (1st Dept. 2009) The defense
State Farm v. Stack 2008 NY Slip Op 07651 (2d Dept. 2008) “A no-fault arbitration tribunal twice concluded that the defendant, James Stack, was entitled to
