Walking out of an EUO leads to a disclaimer and a whole lot more
American States Ins. Co. v Huff, 2014 NY Slip Op 05366 (1st Dept. 2014) (1) “[p]laintiff’s motion for summary judgment as sought a declaration that plaintiff properly
American States Ins. Co. v Huff, 2014 NY Slip Op 05366 (1st Dept. 2014) (1) “[p]laintiff’s motion for summary judgment as sought a declaration that plaintiff properly
American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Plummer, Index #: 153300/12 (Sup. Ct NY Co. 2014) “Defendants’ arguments, inter alia that Unitrin was wrongly decided fail to raise
V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50615(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Prior to trial, the parties stipulated that the
Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Infinity Group, 2014 NY Slip Op 50602(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) The EUO was sufficient to raise an issue of fact as
Universal Health Chiropractic, P.C. v Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50350(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) No preclusion here. “The vehicle involved in the
Doctrinally, a fraudulent procurement defense should not be bound by the 30-day pay or deny rule. This is so since the Appellate Division in Kaplun specifically
Vargas v Sabri, 2014 NY Slip Op 01666 (1st Dept. 2014) In the world of the use of bio mechanical engineer issues, this case is actually a
At first, the Appellate Term said it was a fatal defect. Then, they said it was a waivable defect. After that it was held to be
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Phelps Memorial Hospital, 2013 NY Slip Op 33590(U)(Sup. Ct. Nassau Co. 2013) “This Court conducted a non-jury trial on matter on November 7,
W.W. Med., P.C. v MVAIC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50093(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2014) “The court properly determined that defendant failed to meet its burden of establishing
Westchester Med. Ctr. v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 00500 (2d Dept. 2014) “The respondent’s contention that there was a complete absence of coverage
Russell v Cornell Univ., 2013 NY Slip Op 06771 (3d Dept 2013) “Defendants satisfied their initial burden of establishing that plaintiff did not suffer a causally
American Transit Ins. Co. v. Lawal, Index #: 152405/12 (Sup. Ct. NY Co. 2013) American Transit Ins. Co. v. Devine, Index #: 150505/12 (Sup. Ct. NY
Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v Omni Indem. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51450(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In support of its motion, defendant submitted affidavits
American Tr. Ins. Co. v Urena, 2013 NY Slip Op 31751(U)(Sup Ct. NY CO. 2013) ** American Transit is represented by Law Offices of James F. Sullivan,
Kesick v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 03366 (3d Dept. 2013) “In June 2007, plaintiff — a State Trooper, licensed
Shahid Mian, M.D., P.C. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50589(U)(App. Term. 1st Dept. 2013) “In opposition to the defendant-insurer’s prima facie showing that the
Mount Sinai Hosp. v Dust Tr., Inc., 2013 NY Slip Op 01811 (2d Dept. 2013) “The plaintiff hospital, as assignee of Alison Cassani, commenced this action to
Ideal Med. Supply v Mercury Cas. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 23068 (App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “Although plaintiff’s assignor was a named party in
Jesa Med. Supply, Inc. v NYC Tr. Auth., 2013 NY Slip Op 50188(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In support of its cross motion for summary judgment