What happened Mr. Rookie?
Healthway Med. Care, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51870(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “On its cross motion for summary judgment, the burden was
Healthway Med. Care, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51870(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “On its cross motion for summary judgment, the burden was
Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. v Pontoon, 2014 NY Slip Op 09001 (2d Dept. 2014) “The referee incorrectly concluded that GEICO was required to submit evidence that Pontoon
Jones v MTA Bus Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 08915 (1st Dept. 2014) As for plaintiff’s other claimed injuries, defendants met their burden by relying on
Central Radiology Servs., P.C. v MVAIC, 2014 NY Slip Op 24402 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, Insurance Law § 5202
Interboro Ins. Co. v Anesthesia Solutions, P.C., Index # 600498/14 (Sup. Ct. Nassau Co. 2014) In this case, the insurance carrier provided a peer report and
OBS is not compensable according to Judge d’Auguste “Finally, the parties both cite to statements published on the DOH’s website reflecting its position concerning facility fee
Sanchez v Draper, 2014 NY Slip Op 08584 (1st Dept,. 2014) “Plaintiff also submitted certified medical records of the physical therapy and chiropractic treatment he started receiving
Vargas v Marte, 2014 NY Slip Op 08561 (2d Dept. 2014) Triable issue of fact on causation “In particular, plaintiff’s surgeon, recognizing that plaintiff had sustained a
Perhaps the only thing worse than leaving your fate in the hands of the Civil Court is to leave your fate at the mercy of the
Kester v Sendoya, 2014 NY Slip Op 08379 (1st Dept. 2014) “While plaintiff’s certified medical records may be referenced to show her complaints and the doctor’s referral
Matter of Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v Alexis, 2014 NY Slip Op 07668 (2d Dept. 2014) The term insurable interest is always interesting. What is it really?
Sutliff v Qadar, 2014 NY Slip Op 07769 (1st Dept. 2014) This case really discusses the danger on the personal injury side of the “significant limitation prong”
Matter of Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v Burrous, 2014 NY Slip Op 06986 “From the eyes of the decedent” “Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, Utica
Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51324(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) This was proudly mine and another example of
Ultimate Health Prods., Inc. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51321(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) Good job to my colleague and friend James Sullivan
Optimal Well-Being Chiropractic, P.C. v General Motors Assur. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51323(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “In support of its motion, defendant’s investigator stated that,
Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51240(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Despite plaintiff’s contention to the contrary, defendant was not
Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v Omni Indem. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51235(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “In support of its motion, defendant submitted affidavits by its litigation
Interboro v. Miriam Cantor, Index #: 601298/14 (Sup. Ct. Nassau Co. 2014) Here, Defendant sought no-fault reimbursement before AAA in the amount of $10,888.33. Defendant was
Optimal Well-Being Chiropractic, P.C. v Infinity Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51203(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) This fact pattern asked if under PA law, the injured