Lack of causation not established on a peer review
August 17, 2017 1 Comment
Shur v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51011(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Here, the affirmed report of the doctor who had performed an independent
Shur v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51011(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Here, the affirmed report of the doctor who had performed an independent
Aliosha v Ostad, 2017 NY Slip Op 06055 (2d Dept. 2017) “In attempting to refute the opinion of the defendant’s expert regarding good blood flow to
Frank v Gengler, 2017 NY Slip Op 04423 (2d Dept. 2017) “Here, the Supreme Court erred in determining that the jury verdict in favor of the
Lee v Rodriguez, 2017 NY Slip Op 03869 (1st Dept. 2017) “They also submitted evidence that plaintiffs neither reported any injury to the police immediately after the
Matter of DTG Operations, Inc. v Travelers Indem. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 08967 (1st Dept. 2016) This looks like a case where the Petitioner was fighting
Hojun Hwang v Doe, 2016 NY Slip Op 07610 (1st Dept. 2016) (1) “Defendant made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury
Bobbio v Amboy Bus Co. Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 07101 (1st Dept. 2016) (1) “[defendant] found no objective neurological disability or permanency and full range of motion
Jones v MTA Bus Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 08915 (1st Dept. 2014) As for plaintiff’s other claimed injuries, defendants met their burden by relying on
Sanchez v Draper, 2014 NY Slip Op 08584 (1st Dept,. 2014) “Plaintiff also submitted certified medical records of the physical therapy and chiropractic treatment he started receiving
Vargas v Marte, 2014 NY Slip Op 08561 (2d Dept. 2014) Triable issue of fact on causation “In particular, plaintiff’s surgeon, recognizing that plaintiff had sustained a
Perhaps the only thing worse than leaving your fate in the hands of the Civil Court is to leave your fate at the mercy of the
Kester v Sendoya, 2014 NY Slip Op 08379 (1st Dept. 2014) “While plaintiff’s certified medical records may be referenced to show her complaints and the doctor’s referral
Sutliff v Qadar, 2014 NY Slip Op 07769 (1st Dept. 2014) This case really discusses the danger on the personal injury side of the “significant limitation prong”
Vargas v Sabri, 2014 NY Slip Op 01666 (1st Dept. 2014) In the world of the use of bio mechanical engineer issues, this case is actually a
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Phelps Memorial Hospital, 2013 NY Slip Op 33590(U)(Sup. Ct. Nassau Co. 2013) “This Court conducted a non-jury trial on matter on November 7,
Russell v Cornell Univ., 2013 NY Slip Op 06771 (3d Dept 2013) “Defendants satisfied their initial burden of establishing that plaintiff did not suffer a causally
McDonald v Kohanfars, 2013 NY Slip Op 03821 (2d Dept. 2013) “In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their
Shahid Mian, M.D., P.C. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50589(U)(App. Term. 1st Dept. 2013) “In opposition to the defendant-insurer’s prima facie showing that the
Jesa Med. Supply, Inc. v NYC Tr. Auth., 2013 NY Slip Op 50188(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In support of its cross motion for summary judgment
Grant v United Pavers Co., Inc., 2012 NY Slip Op 00239 (1st Dept. 2012) “Although plaintiff’s physicians did not expressly address defendants’ expert’s conclusion that the
